Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-53236

MEDIUM · 6.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in AndonDesign UDesign Core u-design-core allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects UDesign Core: from n/a through <= 4.14.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing authorization vulnerability in AndonDesign UDesign Core allows attackers to access protected functionality due to incorrectly configured access control security levels. The access control system exists but is misconfigured, permitting unauthorized access to resources that should require proper authorization validation.

MitigationReview and correct access control security level configurations across all endpoints and functions in UDesign Core, ensuring proper authorization checks are enforced for sensitive operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm UDesign Core installation
    Locate and identify the AndonDesign UDesign Core application in your environment - check for the UDesign Core software, its binaries, or web application endpoints
    Affected if UDesign Core is installed and running in the environment
  2. Identify the access control module
    Locate the access control security system configuration within UDesign Core - search for security level settings, access control configuration files, or authorization middleware
    Affected if An access control system exists but security level configurations are present and potentially misconfigured
  3. Test unauthorized access to protected functions
    Attempt to access sensitive endpoints, administrative functions, or protected resources within UDesign Core without providing valid authentication credentials or proper authorization tokens
    Affected if Access is granted to protected functionality without proper authorization validation
  4. Inspect access control security level settings
    Review the security level configuration values assigned to endpoints and functions in UDesign Core - compare the configured levels against expected secure values
    Affected if Security levels are set too permissively or incorrectly, allowing lower-privilege or unauthenticated access to sensitive operations
  5. Verify authorization enforcement on sensitive operations
    Execute sensitive or administrative operations within UDesign Core using an account that should not have permissions for those actions
    Affected if The system allows execution of privileged operations without proper authorization checks despite the access control system being present

Your environment is affected if UDesign Core is installed and the access control security levels are misconfigured, allowing unauthorized access to protected functionality that should require proper authorization validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Review and correct access control security level configurations across all endpoints and functions in UDesign Core, ensuring proper authorization checks are enforced for sensitive operations.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53236 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53236 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data