CVE-2025-53291
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in spoddev2021 Spreadconnect wc-spod.This issue affects Spreadconnect: from n/a through <= 2.1.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a missing authorization vulnerability in the Spreadconnect plugin (wc-spod) versions through 2.1.5. The application fails to properly verify user permissions before allowing access to certain functionality or data, potentially allowing unauthorized users to perform actions or access resources they should not be able to.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Spreadconnect plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins page, or inspect the wp-content/plugins/ directory for a folder named 'wc-spreadconnect' or 'wc-spod'Affected if The plugin folder exists in the plugins directory
-
Determine installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin, view the plugin details page to see the version number, or open the main plugin PHP file (e.g., wc-spreadconnect.php) and check the 'Version' header in the plugin comment blockAffected if Version is 2.1.5 or lower, or version cannot be determined (treat as affected)
-
Verify plugin is activeCheck the WordPress Plugins admin page - look for the 'Active' status indicator next to the Spreadconnect pluginAffected if Plugin is installed and shows as Active
-
Confirm the authorization vulnerability scopeReview the plugin settings and capabilities - the vulnerability allows unauthorized access to sensitive functionality without proper permission checks; test accessing plugin endpoints or features that should require admin/manager privilegesAffected if Non-privileged users (e.g., subscribers, customers) can access plugin admin functions or data they should not be able to see
You are affected if the Spreadconnect (wc-spod) plugin is installed, active, and the version is 2.1.5 or lower, since all versions up to 2.1.5 contain the missing authorization flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks (access control) on all sensitive functions and endpoints within the Spreadconnect plugin to verify user permissions before allowing access.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53291 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53291 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data