CVE-2025-53306
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in lucidcrew WP Forum Server forum-server allows SQL Injection.This issue affects WP Forum Server: from n/a through <= 1.8.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in lucidcrew WP Forum Server (forum-server) allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands via unsanitized user input. The vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 1.8.2 of the forum-server component. This could enable unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or modification.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the forum-server component installationCheck your WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'forum-server', 'lucidcrew-forum-server', or similar. Also check the WordPress admin dashboard under Plugins to see if a forum plugin from lucidcrew is installed.Affected if The forum-server component from lucidcrew is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed versionIf found, open the main plugin file (usually forum-server.php or similar) and look for a version comment or constant defined at the top (e.g., 'Version: 1.8.2'). Alternatively, check the WordPress plugin admin page which displays installed versions.Affected if The version is 1.8.2 or any lower version number
-
Verify the plugin is activeIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and confirm the forum plugin is activated. Also check if the forum functionality is accessible on the frontend.Affected if The plugin is activated and accessible to users
-
Inspect for direct SQL query execution with user inputExamine the forum-server PHP files, particularly those handling user submissions (e.g., files with 'post', 'reply', 'topic', or 'user' in the name). Look for SQL queries built using variables from $_GET, $_POST, or $_REQUEST without using $wpdb->prepare() or parameterized queries.Affected if SQL queries directly concatenate user-supplied input from request parameters without sanitization or prepared statements
-
Review application logs for SQL injection attemptsCheck WordPress debug logs (wp-content/debug.log if logging is enabled) and web server access/error logs for suspicious SQL syntax in query parameters, especially on forum-related URLs.Affected if Logs show SQL-like fragments (e.g., UNION SELECT, OR 1=1, --) in request parameters targeting forum endpoints
A user is affected if the lucidcrew forum-server component is installed with version 1.8.2 or lower and the plugin is active, as the SQL injection vulnerability exists in all these versions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version if available; otherwise, implement parameterized queries or prepared statements and apply input validation on all user-supplied data before SQL execution.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53306 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53306 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data