Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-53312

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Looks Awesome OnionBuzz onionbuzz-viral-quiz allows Stored XSS.This issue affects OnionBuzz: from n/a through <= 1.0.7.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A CSRF vulnerability in the OnionBuzz viral quiz plugin (versions up to 1.0.7) allows attackers to craft malicious requests that inject persistent XSS payloads into the application. Since the XSS is stored, it will execute whenever users view the affected quiz content, enabling session hijacking, credential theft, or defacement.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens with strict origin validation on all state-changing endpoints, and apply robust input validation with context-aware output encoding to prevent stored XSS injection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate OnionBuzz plugin installation
    Access your WordPress site admin panel, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and look for 'OnionBuzz' or 'OnionBuzz Viral Quiz' in the list. Note the installed version displayed next to the plugin name.
    Affected if The plugin is installed and the version shown is 1.0.7 or lower, or if no version number is displayed but the plugin name matches.
  2. Compare installed version against affected range
    If you have file system access, check the main plugin file (typically wp-content/plugins/onionbuzz-viral-quiz/onionbuzz.php or similar) for the 'Version' header in the plugin comment block. Compare this version number to the affected range of versions up to 1.0.7.
    Affected if The version number is 1.0.7 or any version lower than 1.0.7.
  3. Inspect quiz content for stored scripts
    Navigate to the OnionBuzz quiz management area in your WordPress admin (usually under a dedicated menu item for the plugin). View each quiz and inspect the question text, answer options, and results content for any <script> tags, event handlers like onload/onerror, or suspicious iframe/embed elements.
    Affected if Any quiz content contains JavaScript code that was not intentionally added by an administrator, indicating potential XSS payload injection.
  4. Check browser console for script errors
    Visit the public-facing quiz pages on your site using a browser. Open the developer console (F12) and look for any script execution errors or unexpected behavior when loading quiz pages, especially if you did not add custom scripts yourself.
    Affected if JavaScript executes unexpectedly on quiz pages or console shows references to unfamiliar scripts.

Your environment is affected if the OnionBuzz viral quiz plugin is installed with version 1.0.7 or lower, or if you discover unexpected JavaScript code embedded in any quiz content.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens with strict origin validation on all state-changing endpoints, and apply robust input validation with context-aware output encoding to prevent stored XSS injection.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,440
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,904.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53312 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53312 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data