Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-53329

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in szajenw Społecznościowa 6 PL 2013 spolecznosciowa-6-pl-2013 allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Społecznościowa 6 PL 2013: from n/a through <= 2.0.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

CSRF vulnerability in szajenw Społecznościowa 6 PL 2013 component enables attackers to forge authenticated user requests that inject malicious scripts, which are then stored (Stored XSS). The CVSS 7.1 indicates high severity due to the combination of network-exploitable CSRF and the impact of persistent XSS on other users.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens with SameSite cookie attributes for all state-changing operations, add Origin/Referer header validation, and apply context-aware output encoding with strict input validation to prevent stored XSS injection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the szajenw Społecznościowa component installation
    Check your CMS extensions directory or component folder for a directory named 'com_społecznościowa' or 'com_szajenw' (common path for Joomla: /components/com_społecznościowa/ or similar)
    Affected if The component directory exists on the server
  2. Identify the installed version
    Open the main component PHP file (typically install.xml, config.xml, or the main component file) and locate the version declaration or changelog. Compare this version to any official releases of szajenw Społecznościowa 6 PL 2013
    Affected if The installed version matches the 2013 release of szajenw Społecznościowa 6 PL and no security patches have been applied
  3. Inspect state-changing forms for CSRF protection
    Examine forms in the component that perform user actions (submit content, update profiles, post comments). Check the HTML source for anti-CSRF tokens (hidden input fields with names like 'token', 'csrf', or 'form_token') and verify SameSite cookie attributes on session cookies
    Affected if Forms lack anti-CSRF tokens or tokens are not validated server-side, and session cookies lack SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax attributes
  4. Check input validation for stored content
    Test the component's content submission functions by injecting a benign script tag (e.g., <script>alert('test')</script>) in fields like user bio, comments, or profile fields. Submit as an authenticated user and check if the script is stored and rendered without encoding
    Affected if The injected script is rendered unescaped in the browser, indicating stored XSS is possible

A user is affected if the szajenw Społecznościowa component is installed, especially the 2013 version, and forms handling user input lack CSRF tokens and proper input/output encoding.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens with SameSite cookie attributes for all state-changing operations, add Origin/Referer header validation, and apply context-aware output encoding with strict input validation to prevent stored XSS injection.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53329 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53329 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data