Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-53340

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in awesomesupport Awesome Support awesome-support allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects Awesome Support: from n/a through <= 6.3.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing authorization check in the Awesome Support WordPress plugin allows attackers to retrieve embedded sensitive data without proper authentication or authorization. The vulnerability stems from unprotected endpoints or functions that expose sensitive information to unauthorized users.

MitigationApply any available vendor patch/updates. If no patch exists, restrict access to sensitive endpoints via web server configuration or add capability checks and nonce verification to vulnerable functions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Awesome Support plugin is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins, or check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for the awesome-support folder
    Affected if The Awesome Support plugin is present on the WordPress site
  2. Identify installed plugin version
    Check the plugin header in awesome-support.php file, or view the plugin version in WordPress admin > Plugins > Awesome Support
    Affected if Installed version falls within any affected version range (compare your version to the officially documented affected range)
  3. Verify sensitive endpoints are accessible without authentication
    Test accessing common Awesome Support API endpoints (such as /wp-json/awesome-support/v1/* or ajax handlers at /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=*) using an unauthenticated browser or curl request
    Affected if Sensitive data or functionality returns without requiring login credentials
  4. Check for proper capability checks on sensitive functions
    Review plugin source code for current_user_can() or capability checks before processing data in public-facing ajax handlers or REST API endpoints
    Affected if No capability checks exist before exposing sensitive ticket data or admin functions
  5. Inspect user role permissions for ticket access
    Test whether unauthenticated users or lower-privileged roles can view tickets belonging to other users or admins via direct URL access or API calls
    Affected if Users without proper authorization can retrieve tickets or sensitive information they should not access

The site is affected if the Awesome Support plugin is installed AND lacks proper authorization controls on sensitive endpoints, allowing unauthenticated or unauthorized users to access sensitive ticket data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply any available vendor patch/updates. If no patch exists, restrict access to sensitive endpoints via web server configuration or add capability checks and nonce verification to vulnerable functions.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53340 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53340 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data