CVE-2025-53560
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in rascals Noisa noisa allows Object Injection.This issue affects Noisa: from n/a through <= 2.6.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerability is a deserialization of untrusted data flaw in the Noisa application that allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary PHP objects by supplying crafted serialized data. This object injection can lead to code execution, file operations, or other malicious actions depending on available magic methods in the application environment.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Noisa application installationSearch the system for directories or files associated with the Noisa application, such as web root directories containing 'noisa' in the path, or check for installed packages related to Noisa.Affected if The Noisa application is found installed or deployed on the system.
-
Identify PHP deserialization functions in the codebaseSearch the Noisa source code files (particularly PHP files) for calls to unserialize(), and review any custom deserialization logic that handles serialized data.Affected if The codebase contains unserialize() calls or similar PHP deserialization functions that process input data.
-
Determine if user input reaches deserializationTrace the data flow from HTTP request parameters, POST data, cookies, or API inputs to identify whether any untrusted data is passed to unserialize() or deserialization functions.Affected if Untrusted or user-supplied data is directly or indirectly fed into deserialization functions without validation.
-
Check for magic method definitionsSearch the Noisa codebase for PHP magic method definitions such as __wakeup(), __destruct(), __toString(), __invoke(), __get(), or __set() that could be triggered during object injection.Affected if The application defines magic methods that could be leveraged during object injection to execute arbitrary code or file operations.
-
Inspect input handling configurationReview application configuration files, routing logic, and endpoint definitions to determine if the application accepts and processes serialized data from external sources.Affected if The application is configured to accept serialized data from untrusted network sources.
A user is affected if the Noisa application is installed and its codebase contains unserialize() calls that process untrusted input without proper validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version if available, otherwise refactor code to use safe serialization formats like JSON instead of PHP unserialize() and implement strict input validation with allowlist validation for any deserialized content.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53560 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53560 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data