CVE-2025-53586
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in NooTheme WeMusic noo-wemusic allows Object Injection.This issue affects WeMusic: from n/a through <= 1.9.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a PHP Object Injection vulnerability in the WeMusic WordPress theme caused by unsafe deserialization (likely using PHP unserialize() on untrusted user input). Object injection can lead to remote code execution if the application has vulnerable classes that can be chained for RCE, or other impacts like file operations depending on available gadget chains.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WeMusic theme is installedNavigate to WordPress admin > Appearance > Themes, or inspect /wp-content/themes/ directory for weMusic theme folderAffected if WeMusic theme is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify installed WeMusic versionCheck theme style.css header for 'Version:' value, or look for version constant in theme functions.phpAffected if Version is older than the latest patched version (version number comparison needed against vendor release notes)
-
Search for unsafe unserialize() callsGrep the WeMusic theme folder for 'unserialize(' pattern: grep -r "unserialize(" /wp-content/themes/wemusic/Affected if Any unserialize() call is found that processes user-supplied data
-
Trace user input to unserialize() callsReview code around unserialize() calls to determine if parameters come from $_GET, $_POST, $_REQUEST, or database fields that can be controlled by usersAffected if User-controllable input reaches unserialize() function without sanitization
-
Check for vulnerable gadget chainsReview all included PHP files in the theme for classes with magic methods (__wakeup, __destruct, __call, __invoke) that could be chained for RCEAffected if Vulnerable classes exist that could be exploited via object injection
A user is affected if WeMusic theme is installed, runs an outdated version, and contains unserialize() calls that process user-supplied input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate WeMusic to the latest patched version. If no patch exists, audit the codebase for unsafe unserialize() calls on user input and replace with safe alternatives like json_decode().
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53586 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53586 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data