Nouvola DivecloudApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2025-53671

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.08 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jenkins Nouvola DiveCloud Plugin 1.08 and earlier does not mask DiveCloud API Keys and Credentials Encryption Keys displayed on the job configuration form, increasing the potential for attackers to observe and capture them.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Jenkins Nouvola DiveCloud Plugin versions 1.08 and earlier renders sensitive DiveCloud API Keys and Credentials Encryption Keys as visible (unmasked) text fields on the job configuration form, allowing any user with access to view the job configuration to read these credentials in plain text.

MitigationUpdate to Nouvola DiveCloud Plugin version 1.09 or later which masks these credential fields, or if no update is available, restrict administrative access to job configurations and audit existing configurations for exposed credentials.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Nouvola DivecloudApplication
Affected:<= 1.08

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Nouvola DiveCloud plugin is installed
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'Nouvola' or 'DiveCloud', or run: jenkins-cli.jar who-am-i or check $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/ for divecloud plugin directory
    Affected if The plugin is listed as installed on the system
  2. Determine the plugin version
    In the Installed Plugins tab, locate the Nouvola DiveCloud entry and note the Version column; alternatively, check the manifest file at $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/divecloud/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
    Affected if The installed version is 1.08 or earlier (e.g., 1.07, 1.06, 1.0, etc.)
  3. Identify jobs using DiveCloud configuration
    Search job config.xml files in $JENKINS_HOME/jobs/ for 'divecloud', 'nouvola', or 'divecloud-plugin' XML elements, or use Jenkins CLI: jenkins-cli.jar list-jobs -s and inspect job configurations containing DiveCloud build steps or settings
    Affected if Any Jenkins jobs are configured with DiveCloud plugin settings (such as API keys, credentials, or build configurations)
  4. Examine credential storage in job configurations
    Open the XML configuration of jobs using DiveCloud and inspect whether <divecloud> or related credential fields appear as plain text (unmasked) values rather than <secret> tags or masked password fields; view job config via: /job/JOBNAME/config.xml
    Affected if Credential fields (API Keys, Encryption Keys) are stored as visible plaintext values in the job XML configuration

A user is affected if the Nouvola DiveCloud plugin version 1.08 or earlier is installed AND any jobs are configured with DiveCloud credentials, which would be exposed as unmasked plaintext in job configuration views.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.08
Interim mitigation

Update to Nouvola DiveCloud Plugin version 1.09 or later which masks these credential fields, or if no update is available, restrict administrative access to job configurations and audit existing configurations for exposed credentials.

Fix this in Nouvola Divecloud Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53671 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53671 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data