XooaApplication · Jenkins
CVE-2025-53677
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins Xooa Plugin 0.0.7 and earlier does not mask the Xooa Deployment Token on the global configuration form, increasing the potential for attackers to observe and capture it.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins Xooa Plugin version 0.0.7 and earlier does not mask the Xooa Deployment Token field on the global configuration form, causing the sensitive token to be displayed in plain text instead of being masked with bullets or asterisks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
XooaApplication
<= 0.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Xooa plugin is installedNavigate to Jenkins Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'Xooa', or use the Jenkins CLI: java -jar jenkins-cli.jar list-plugins | grep -i xooaAffected if The Xooa plugin appears in the installed plugins list
-
Check the installed Xooa plugin versionIn the Installed Plugins page, locate the Xooa plugin and note the version number displayed in the 'Version' columnAffected if The installed version is 0.0.7 or earlier
-
Inspect global configuration form for token maskingNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Configure System and locate the 'Xooa' section. Examine the 'Xooa Deployment Token' input field to determine if the entered value is displayed as plain text or masked with bullets/asterisksAffected if The token field shows plain text characters instead of masking the input with bullets or asterisks
-
Check browser developer tools for input typeRight-click the Xooa Deployment Token field in the global configuration, inspect the HTML element, and verify the 'type' attribute of the input fieldAffected if The input element has type='text' instead of type='password'
A user is affected if the Xooa plugin version 0.0.7 or earlier is installed AND the Deployment Token field on the global configuration page displays the token in plain text rather than being masked.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Jenkins Xooa Plugin to a version that properly masks the deployment token field, or restrict administrative access to the global configuration page until a fix is available.
Fix this in Xooa
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53677 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53677 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data