Tl Wr841n FirmwareOperating system · Tp Link

CVE-2025-53711

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 160325 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability has been found in TP-Link TL-WR841N v11, TL-WR842ND v2 and TL-WR494N v3. The vulnerability exists in the /userRpm/WlanNetworkRpm.htm file due to missing input parameter validation, which may lead to the buffer overflow to cause a crash of the web service and result in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. The attack may be launched remotely. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the TP-Link TL-WR841N v11, TL-WR842ND v2, and TL-WR494N v3 wireless routers in the /userRpm/WlanNetworkRpm.htm web interface. The vulnerability stems from missing input validation on parameters passed to this file, allowing an attacker to overflow a buffer, crash the web service, and cause a denial-of-service condition. The attack can be launched remotely over the network.

MitigationThese are end-of-life devices with no vendor support or patches available. Organizations should immediately disable remote web management interfaces, implement network segmentation to isolate affected devices behind firewalls, and plan for replacement with supported hardware.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Tl Wr841n FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= 160325

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Check the hardware label or web interface status page to confirm the exact model number (TL-WR841N v11, TL-WR842ND v2, or TL-WR494N v3)
    Affected if The device is not one of the three affected models listed
  2. Check the firmware version
    Access the router web interface (typically at 192.168.0.1 or 192.168.1.1) and navigate to the System Tools > Firmware Upgrade or Status page to view the installed firmware version. For TL-WR841N, compare the version date/build number against 160325
    Affected if The firmware version is 160325 or earlier for TL-WR841N, or the device is an unpatched TL-WR842ND v2 or TL-WR494N v3
  3. Verify the web management interface is accessible
    Attempt to reach the router web interface over HTTP/HTTPS from the network. Confirm the URL /userRpm/WlanNetworkRpm.htm is accessible
    Affected if The web interface is exposed and the specific vulnerable endpoint responds to requests
  4. Confirm remote access is enabled
    Check the router's Access Management or Remote Management settings to determine if HTTP/HTTPS management access is allowed from WAN (remote) IPs
    Affected if Remote web management is enabled, allowing unauthenticated attackers to reach the vulnerable endpoint over the internet

A user is affected if they operate a TL-WR841N (firmware <=160325), TL-WR842ND v2, or TL-WR494N v3 device with the web interface remotely accessible, enabling unauthenticated attackers to trigger the buffer overflow via the /userRpm/WlanNetworkRpm.htm endpoint.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 160325
Interim mitigation

These are end-of-life devices with no vendor support or patches available. Organizations should immediately disable remote web management interfaces, implement network segmentation to isolate affected devices behind firewalls, and plan for replacement with supported hardware.

Fix this in Tl Wr841n Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
36.0 hours of engineering $6,400
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53711 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53711 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data