CVE-2025-53718
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse after free in Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUse-after-free vulnerability in the Windows Ancillary Function Driver (AFD) for WinSock enables a local authenticated attacker to elevate privileges to SYSTEM level by exploiting improper memory management in the kernel-mode driver.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.21100< 10.0.14393.8330< 10.0.17763.7678< 10.0.19044.6216< 10.0.19045.6216< 10.0.22621.5768< 10.0.22631.5768< 10.0.26100.4851CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version and build numberRun 'winver' from command prompt or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to get the exact Windows edition, version, and build numberAffected if The displayed build number falls below any of these thresholds: 10.0.10240.21100 (Win10 1507), 10.0.14393.8330 (Win10 1607), 10.0.17763.7678 (Win10 1809), 10.0.19044.6216 (Win10 21h2), 10.0.19045.6216 (Win10 22h2), 10.0.22621.5768 (Win11 22h2), 10.0.22631.5768 (Win11 23h2), or 10.0.26100.4851 (Win11
-
Confirm AFD driver presenceVerify the AFD.sys driver exists by running 'dir C:\Windows\System32\drivers\afd.sys' in an elevated command promptAffected if The file exists (this is normal for Windows systems with WinSock support; the vulnerability is in the driver code itself, not its presence)
-
Check if system has recent security updatesRun 'wmic qfe list' or check Windows Update history to see installed security updates, looking for the patch date corresponding to this CVEAffected if No security update addressing this CVE is installed and the Windows version falls within the affected range from step 1
A system is affected if it runs any Windows 10 or 11 version with a build number lower than the fixed versions listed and lacks the corresponding security update for this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2110010.0.14393.833010.0.17763.7678
Apply the relevant Microsoft security update for this vulnerability (KB reference required) to all affected Windows systems. Prioritize patching domain controllers and systems with high privilege access given the local privilege escalation vector.
Windows 10 1507 to build 10.0.10240.21100 | Windows 10 1607 to build 10.0.14393.8330 | Windows 10 1809 to build 10.0.17763.7678 | Windows 10 21h2 to build 10.0.19044.6216 | Windows 10 22h2 to build 10.0.19045.6216 | Windows 11 22h2 to build 10.0.22621.5768 | Windows 11 23h2 to build 10.0.22631.5768
- Identify the current Windows version and build number by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo'
- Determine which affected version range your current Windows installation falls into from the list: 1507, 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2, 22h2 (Win11), 23h2 (Win11), or 24h2 (Win11)
- Open Settings > Windows Update and check for updates, or run 'ms-settings:windowsupdate'
- Install all available security updates. The fix is included in the monthly cumulative updates for the respective Windows version
- After updates install, verify the build number meets or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release: 10.0.10240.21100 (1507), 10.0.14393.8330 (1607), 10.0.17763.7678 (1809), 10.0.19044.6216 (21h2), 10.0.19045.6216 (22h2), 10.0.22621.5768 (Win11 22h2), 10.0.22631.5768 (Win11 23h2), or 10.0.26100.4851 (Win11 24h2)
- Restart the system to complete the update installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53718 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53718 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data