CVE-2025-53719
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse of uninitialized resource in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an information disclosure vulnerability in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) where an uninitialized resource is used, allowing an authorized attacker to potentially read sensitive information from memory over a network. The vulnerability stems from improper initialization of data structures within the RRAS component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= r2all versions= r2< 10.0.14393.8330< 10.0.17763.7678< 10.0.20348.3989< 10.0.25398.1791< 10.0.26100.4851CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if RRAS service is installedRun 'Get-Service -Name RemoteAccess' in PowerShell or check registry key 'HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\RemoteAccess'Affected if The RemoteAccess service does not exist or is not present on the system
-
Check RRAS service statusRun 'Get-Service -Name RemoteAccess' to see if the service is Running or StoppedAffected if The RemoteAccess service is in a Running state - the vulnerability only applies when RRAS is active
-
Determine Windows Server versionRun 'winver' or execute 'Get-ItemProperty -Path 'HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion' | Select-Object CurrentBuild, DisplayVersion, UBR' in PowerShellAffected if The build number falls below the following thresholds: Server 2016 < 14393.8330, Server 2019 < 17763.7678, Server 2022 < 20348.3989, Server 2022 23h2 < 25398.1791, Server 2025 < 26100.4851
-
Confirm Windows Server 2008/2012 installationRun 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to identify the exact Windows versionAffected if The system is running Windows Server 2008 (any version/R2) or Windows Server 2012 (any version/R2) - all of these versions are affected
A system is affected if RRAS is enabled/running AND the Windows Server version matches one of the affected version ranges listed in the CVE (any version for Server 2008/2012, or below the specified build numbers for newer versions).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.833010.0.17763.767810.0.20348.3989
Apply Microsoft security updates for this vulnerability to affected Windows servers running RRAS. If RRAS is not required, consider disabling the service to reduce attack surface.
Apply security updates: Windows Server 2016 to build 10.0.14393.8330 or later; Windows Server 2019 to build 10.0.17763.7678 or later; Windows Server 2022 to build 10.0.20348.3989 or later; Windows Server 2022 23h2 to build 10.0.25398.1791 or later; Windows Server 2025 to build 10.0.26100.4851 or lat
- Open Windows Update on the affected server (Start > Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update)
- Click 'Check for updates' to identify available security updates
- Install the latest cumulative security update for your Windows Server version
- Restart the server if prompted after installation
- Verify the update was installed successfully by checking Windows Update history
- For Windows Server 2008/2012 which are out of mainstream support, check if Extended Security Updates (ESU) are applicable or consider migrating to a supported version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53719 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53719 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data