CVE-2025-5372
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in libssh versions built with OpenSSL versions older than 3.0, specifically in the ssh_kdf() function responsible for key derivation. Due to inconsistent interpretation of return values where OpenSSL uses 0 to indicate failure and libssh uses 0 for success—the function may mistakenly return a success status even when key derivation fails. This results in uninitialized cryptographic key buffers being used in subsequent communication, potentially compromising SSH sessions' confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA return value interpretation mismatch in libssh's ssh_kdf() function causes it to report success when OpenSSL key derivation actually fails. This occurs because OpenSSL uses 0 to indicate failure while libssh uses 0 for success, leading to uninitialized cryptographic keys being used in SSH sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0= 6.0= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0= 10.0< 0.11.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed libssh versionRun 'rpm -q libssh' or check your package manager for the libssh package versionAffected if The installed version is less than 0.11.2
-
Determine if SSH service is activeCheck if the SSH daemon is running using 'systemctl status sshd' or 'systemctl status ssh'Affected if SSH service is active and libssh version is vulnerable
-
Check OpenSSL version in useRun 'openssl version' to identify the OpenSSL versionAffected if OpenSSL version is older than 3.0 (the mismatch occurs when OpenSSL returns 0 for failure, which libssh misinterprets as success)
-
Verify Red Hat Enterprise Linux versionRun 'cat /etc/redhat-release' to check the RHEL versionAffected if Running RHEL 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, or 10.0 with vulnerable libssh
-
Check for libssh usage in applicationsIdentify applications linking to libssh using 'ldd' or 'lsof' on ssh-related binariesAffected if Applications use libssh for SSH key derivation and the library version is vulnerable
You are affected if libssh version is below 0.11.2 and SSH sessions are established using libssh, particularly when built against OpenSSL versions older than 3.0.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.11.2
Upgrade OpenSSL to version 3.0 or newer when building libssh, or update libssh to correctly handle OpenSSL return values in the ssh_kdf() function.
libssh >= 0.11.2
- Identify the libssh package version currently installed using 'rpm -q libssh' or 'yum list installed libssh'
- For Red Hat Enterprise Linux systems, update via 'yum update libssh' or 'dnf update libssh' to pull the latest fixed package
- For OpenShift Container Platform 4.0, apply the corresponding security errata via 'oc adm upgrade' or through the web console
- Verify the updated version is 0.11.2 or later using 'rpm -q libssh'
- Restart any SSH services or containers using libssh to ensure the updated library is loaded
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-5372 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-5372 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data