CVE-2025-53720
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) that allows an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. The vulnerability stems from improper memory handling within the RRAS service, which processes network routing and remote access requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= r2all versions= r2< 10.0.14393.8330< 10.0.17763.7678< 10.0.20348.3989< 10.0.25398.1791< 10.0.26100.4851CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify RRAS service statusOpen Services console (services.msc) or run 'Get-Service RemoteAccess' in PowerShell. Check if the RemoteAccess service is running or enabled.Affected if If RemoteAccess (RRAS) service is running or set to Automatic, the server is potentially affected.
-
Identify Windows Server build versionRun 'winver' from command prompt, or use PowerShell with '[System.Environment]::OSVersion.Version' or 'Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object OsBuildNumber,OsVersion'. For more detail, run 'systeminfo' and look at the OS Version line.Affected if The build number displayed must be compared against the affected version thresholds.
-
Compare build against affected versionsFor Windows Server 2016: compare to 10.0.14393.8330. For Server 2019: compare to 10.0.17763.7678. For Server 2022: compare to 10.0.20348.3989. For Server 2022 23h2: compare to 10.0.25398.1791. For Server 2025: compare to 10.0.26100.4851. Servers 2008/2012/2012 R2 are all affected regardless of build.Affected if If the installed build number is lower than the corresponding threshold for the server version, the system is affected.
-
Confirm RRAS role is installedOpen Server Manager, go to 'Add Roles and Features', or run 'Get-WindowsFeature -Name Routing' in PowerShell. Check if the Remote Access role with Routing role service is installed.Affected if If the Routing role is installed, the attack surface is present.
A server is affected if it runs a vulnerable Windows Server version (2016-2025 below threshold, or any 2008/2012) AND has the RRAS/RemoteAccess service enabled or installed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.833010.0.17763.767810.0.20348.3989
Apply Microsoft security updates for CVE-2025-53720 to affected Windows servers running RRAS. If immediate patching is not feasible, disable RRAS if not required, or restrict network access to trusted authenticated users only.
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2025-53720; specific build numbers: Server 2016 at 10.0.14393.8330, Server 2019 at 10.0.17763.7678, Server 2022 at 10.0.20348.3989, Server 2022 23h2 at 10.0.25398.1791, Server 2025 at 10.0.26100.4851
- Identify the current build version of your Windows Server by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"'
- Apply the corresponding security update from Microsoft Update Catalog or Windows Update for your Windows Server version
- For Windows Server 2016: update to build 10.0.14393.8330 or later
- For Windows Server 2019: update to build 10.0.17763.7678 or later
- For Windows Server 2022: update to build 10.0.20348.3989 or later
- For Windows Server 2022 23h2: update to build 10.0.25398.1791 or later
- For Windows Server 2025: update to build 10.0.26100.4851 or later
- Restart the server if prompted by the update installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53720 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53720 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data