CVE-2025-53729
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper access control in Azure File Sync allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAzure File Sync contains an improper access control vulnerability that allows an already-authorized attacker to escalate their privileges locally on the affected system. This is a local privilege elevation issue stemming from insufficient access control enforcement in the Azure File Sync component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 18.0.0.0, < 18.3.0.0>= 19.0.0.0, < 19.2.0.0>= 20.0.0.0, < 20.1.0.0>= 21.0.0.0, <= 21.1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Azure File Sync is installedCheck for the Azure File Sync service named 'FileSyncSvc' in Services.msc, or look for installation in Program Files\Azure\FileSync, or check registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Azure\FileSyncAffected if Azure File Sync is not installed on the system
-
Find installed Azure File Sync versionRight-click the executable StorageSyncServiceHost.exe in the Azure File Sync installation folder (typically Program Files\Azure\FileSync\Agent), select Properties, and view the File Version; or run: (Get-ItemProperty -Path 'HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\*' | Where-Object {$_.DisplayName -like '*Azure File Sync*'}).DisplayVersionAffected if No version is returned or Azure File Sync is not found
-
Compare version against affected rangesCompare the installed version number to these ranges: 18.0.0.0 through 18.2.x.x, 19.0.0.0 through 19.1.x.x, 20.0.0.0 through 20.0.x.x, 21.0.0.0 through 21.1.0.0Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges (18.0.0.0 to <18.3.0.0, 19.0.0.0 to <19.2.0.0, 20.0.0.0 to <20.1.0.0, or 21.0.0.0 to <=21.1.0.0)
-
Confirm local user environmentRun 'Get-LocalUser' in PowerShell to list local user accounts on the systemAffected if Multiple local user accounts exist and Azure File Sync is running under a service account with elevated local permissions that could be exploited for privilege escalation
The system is affected if Azure File Sync is installed with a version matching any of the four affected ranges and the service runs with elevated local permissions accessible to other local users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.3.0.019.2.0.020.1.0.0
Apply Microsoft security updates for Azure File Sync when released. Review and restrict local user permissions to the principle of least privilege as an interim measure.
Upgrade to version 18.3.0.0 or later for 18.x branch; 19.2.0.0 or later for 19.x branch; 20.1.0.0 or later for 20.x branch; 21.2.0.0 or latest 21.x for 21.x branch
- Identify the currently installed Azure File Sync version using Get-StorageSyncServer or the Storage Sync service properties in Azure portal
- Determine which version branch (18.x, 19.x, 20.x, or 21.x) you are currently running
- For Azure File Sync agents running on Windows servers, download the latest agent from the Microsoft Update Catalog or Microsoft Download Center
- Follow the standard Azure File Sync agent upgrade procedure: stop the Azure File Sync service (Stop-Service -Name 'FileSyncSvc'), run the installer for the fixed version, restart the service
- Alternatively, for agent updates managed through Azure, navigate to the Storage Sync Service in the Azure portal, select 'Sync groups', choose the relevant server, and apply the update
- After upgrading, verify the new version using Get-StorageSyncServer to confirm it matches or exceeds 18.3.0.0, 19.2.0.0, 20.1.0.0, or 21.2.0.0 respectively
- Test that file synchronization continues to function correctly after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53729 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53729 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data