CVE-2025-53797
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer over-read in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer over-read vulnerability exists in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) that allows an unauthenticated attacker on the network to read memory contents beyond allocated buffer boundaries, potentially disclosing sensitive information. The flaw requires network access to the affected RRAS service and does not require authentication to exploit.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= r2all versions= r2< 10.0.14393.8422< 10.0.17763.7792< 10.0.20348.4106< 10.0.25398.1849< 10.0.26100.6508CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify RRAS role is installedOpen Server Manager, go to Manage > Add Roles and Features, check if 'Remote Access' role with 'Routing' role service is installed. Or run 'Get-WindowsFeature -Name Routing' in PowerShell on the server.Affected if RRAS role is installed and the Routing role service is enabled
-
Confirm Windows Server version falls within affected rangeRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to get the exact Windows build number. Compare against: Server 2008 (all), Server 2012 (all), Server 2012 R2 (all), Server 2016 < 10.0.14393.8422, Server 2019 < 10.0.17763.7792, Server 2022 < 10.0.20348.4106, Server 2022 23h2 < 10.0.25398.1849, Server 2025 < 10.0.26100.6508Affected if Windows Server version is lower than the specific build number for that release family
-
Check if RRAS service is running and listening on networkRun 'Get-Service RemoteAccess' in PowerShell to check service status. Run 'netstat -ano | findstr "1723 1701 47"' to check for RRAS-related listening ports (PPTP, L2TP, GRE).Affected if RemoteAccess service is running and bound to network-facing ports
-
Verify RRAS is network-accessibleFrom an external system, attempt to reach RRAS ports: 1723 (PPTP), 1701 (L2TP), or test GRE (protocol 47). Use 'Test-NetConnection -ComputerName <server> -Port 1723' from a remote host.Affected if RRAS ports are open and reachable from untrusted networks
System is affected if RRAS Routing role is installed on an unpatched Windows Server version within the affected build ranges and the service is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.842210.0.17763.779210.0.20348.4106
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2025-53797 once available, or disable RRAS if not required in the environment, and restrict network access to RRAS ports via firewall rules as a defense-in-depth measure.
Upgrade to the specified build number or later for your Windows Server version via Windows Update or Microsoft Update Catalog
- Identify the current Windows Server version by running `winver` or `systeminfo` in Command Prompt
- Determine which version band your server falls into (2008, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022, 2022 23h2, or 2025)
- For Windows Server 2016: upgrade to build 10.0.14393.8422 or later
- For Windows Server 2019: upgrade to build 10.0.17763.7792 or later
- For Windows Server 2022: upgrade to build 10.0.20348.4106 or later
- For Windows Server 2022 23h2: upgrade to build 10.0.25398.1849 or later
- For Windows Server 2025: upgrade to build 10.0.26100.6508 or later
- Apply the latest Windows Updates via Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update, or run `Get-WindowsUpdate` in PowerShell with admin privileges
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53797 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53797 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data