CVE-2025-53948
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Sante PACS Server allows a remote attacker to crash the main thread by sending a crafted HL7 message, causing a denial-of-service condition. The application would require a manual restart and no authentication is required.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSante PACS Server contains a vulnerability in its HL7 message parsing functionality. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted HL7 message that triggers a crash in the main thread, causing the application to become unavailable. The server requires manual restart to recover normal operation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Sante PACS Server versionCheck the application version through the Sante PACS Server administration interface, or look for version information in the installation directory or registry depending on the deployment methodAffected if The installed version is lower than 4.2.3
-
Determine if HL7 listener service is enabledInspect the server configuration to verify whether the HL7 listening service is active and accepting incoming connections. This is typically found in the HL7 server settings or network listener configuration within the Sante PACS administration panelAffected if The HL7 listener service is enabled and accessible over the network
-
Verify network exposure of HL7 portIdentify the port configured for HL7 communication (commonly port 2575 or 2576) and determine if it is exposed to untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules or network configurationAffected if The HL7 port is reachable from untrusted or external network segments
-
Check for recent application crashesReview application event logs, crash dump files, or service restart history for evidence of unexpected application termination events, particularly those occurring around HL7 message processingAffected if Multiple application crashes or unexpected restarts have occurred and correlate with HL7 message activity
The server is affected if it runs a version of Sante PACS Server below 4.2.3 with the HL7 listener service enabled and exposed, as the vulnerability is triggered by receiving specially crafted HL7 messages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.2.3
Implement robust input validation and bounds checking on all incoming HL7 message fields before processing. Consider network segmentation to restrict HL7 message sources to trusted systems and implement rate limiting to detect potential abuse. Monitor for repeated crashes as an indicator of attack attempts.
4.2.3 or later
- 1. Back up the current Sante PACS Server configuration and any critical data
- 2. Obtain Sante PACS Server version 4.2.3 or later from the official vendor source
- 3. Stop the currently running Sante PACS Server service
- 4. Install the upgraded Sante PACS Server version 4.2.3 or later
- 5. Restore the configuration from the backup if needed
- 6. Start the Sante PACS Server service
- 7. Verify the application is running correctly and accepting connections
- 8. Test that HL7 message processing is working without crashes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53948 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53948 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data