CVE-2025-53950
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Exposure of Private Personal Information ('Privacy Violation') vulnerability [CWE-359] in Fortinet FortiDLP Agent's Outlookproxy plugin for MacOS and Windows 11.5.1 and 11.4.2 through 11.4.6 and 11.3.2 through 11.3.4 and 11.2.0 through 11.2.3 and 11.1.1. through 11.1.2 and 11.0.1 and 10.5.1 and 10.4.0, and 10.3.1 may allow an authenticated administrator to collect current user's email information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a privacy violation (CWE-359) in FortiDLP Agent's Outlookproxy plugin on MacOS and Windows. The vulnerability allows an authenticated administrator to collect the current user's email information, exposing private personal data that should not be accessible even to administrators.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.3.1, <= 11.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed FortiDLP Agent versionOn Windows, open Programs and Features or run 'reg query "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Fortinet\FortiDLP Agent" /v Version'. On MacOS, run 'defaults read /Applications/FortiDLP\ Agent.app/Contents/Info CFBundleShortVersionString' or check via the FortiDLP console.Affected if The installed version is 10.3.1 through 11.5.1 inclusive, meaning the version falls within the affected range.
-
Verify Outlookproxy plugin is loadedCheck if the Outlookproxy plugin is present and enabled. On Windows, look in the FortiDLP Agent installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\Fortinet\FortiDLP Agent\) for an outlookproxy.dll or similar module. On MacOS, check /Applications/FortiDLP Agent.app/Contents/PlugIns/ for the outlookproxy component.Affected if The Outlookproxy plugin file exists and is loaded by the FortiDLP Agent, which is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable.
-
Review administrator email access policiesAccess the FortiDLP administrative console and review policies related to Outlook/email monitoring. Look for any policies that grant administrators access to user email data, specifically the 'email content' or 'email metadata' collection features within the Outlookproxy configuration.Affected if Policies are configured that allow administrators to access or export user email information through the FortiDLP console.
-
Inspect audit logs for administrator email data accessIn the FortiDLP console, review administrative audit logs for events involving 'email_read', 'email_export', or similar actions performed by administrators on the Outlookproxy plugin. Check if any administrator accounts have accessed user email data.Affected if Audit logs show administrator accounts have accessed or retrieved user email content or metadata through the Outlookproxy plugin.
A user is affected if their FortiDLP Agent version is between 10.3.1 and 11.5.1 inclusive AND the Outlookproxy plugin is enabled, allowing administrators to access user email data that should be restricted.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade FortiDLP Agent to the latest patched version provided by Fortinet. Review and audit administrator access controls to ensure proper separation of duties and limit email data collection to only necessary administrative functions.
FortiDLP Agent 11.6.0 or later (the first release after 11.5.1 that addresses this privacy violation)
- 1. Identify the current FortiDLP Agent version installed on affected MacOS and Windows systems
- 2. Navigate to the FortiDLP admin console or use the appropriate management interface
- 3. Schedule an upgrade to FortiDLP Agent version 11.6.0 or later, which contains the fix for this vulnerability
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the agent version in the admin console
- 5. Confirm the Outlookproxy plugin is functioning correctly after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53950 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53950 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data