CVE-2025-54093
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTime-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition in Windows TCP/IP allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition exists in the Windows TCP/IP stack that allows a locally authorized attacker to manipulate the timing between a security check and the use of that check's result, enabling local privilege elevation from a lower-privileged context to higher system privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.21128< 10.0.14393.8422< 10.0.17763.7792< 10.0.19044.6332< 10.0.19045.6332< 10.0.22621.5909< 10.0.22631.5909< 10.0.26100.6508CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows build numberOpen Command Prompt or PowerShell and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to see the installed buildAffected if The build number is lower than the fixed version for your Windows release (10.0.10240.21128 for 1507, 10.0.14393.8422 for 1607, 10.0.17763.7792 for 1809, 10.0.19044.6332 or 10.0.19045.6332 for 10, 10.0.22621.5909 for 11 22h2, 10.0.22631.5909 for 11 23h2, 10.0.26100.6508 for 11 24h2)
-
Identify Windows release versionRun 'winver' to confirm whether you are on Windows 10 1507, 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2 or Windows 11 22h2, 23h2, 24h2Affected if The release corresponds to an affected version branch with a build number below the fixed threshold
-
Confirm TCP/IP stack is presentVerify the Windows networking stack is operational by checking that network adapters are available via 'ipconfig /all' or 'Get-NetAdapter' in PowerShellAffected if The TCP/IP stack is present on any Windows system, which is the default configuration; the vulnerability exists in the TCP/IP stack itself regardless of configuration
The system is affected if the installed Windows build number falls below the fixed build for your specific Windows release version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2112810.0.14393.842210.0.17763.7792
Apply Microsoft security patches for this vulnerability immediately. Until patched, limit local user privileges to the minimum required and monitor for suspicious process activity that could indicate exploitation attempts.
Windows 10 1507 to 10.0.10240.21128+ | Windows 10 1607 to 10.0.14393.8422+ | Windows 10 1809 to 10.0.17763.7792+ | Windows 10 21h2 to 10.0.19044.6332+ | Windows 10 22h2 to 10.0.19045.6332+ | Windows 11 22h2 to 10.0.22621.5909+ | Windows 11 23h2 to 10.0.22631.5909+ | Windows 11 24h2 to 10.0.26100.650
- 1. Identify the exact Windows version and build number by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- 2. Determine which Windows 10 or 11 version and build is currently installed from the list: 1507, 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2, 22h2 (Windows 11), 23h2 (Windows 11), or 24h2 (Windows 11)
- 3. Check if the current build number is below the fixed version for your release: 10.0.10240.21128 (1507), 10.0.14393.8422 (1607), 10.0.17763.7792 (1809), 10.0.19044.6332 (21h2), 10.0.19045.6332 (22h2), 10.0.22621.5909 (Win11 22h2), 10.0.22631.5909 (Win11 23h2), or 10.0.26100.6508 (Win11 24h2)
- 4. If vulnerable, apply the latest Windows Updates by navigating to Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update and selecting 'Check for updates'
- 5. Alternatively, manually download and install the specific cumulative update from the Microsoft Update Catalog matching your Windows version
- 6. After installation, restart the system to apply the TCP/IP security update
- 7. Verify the fix by checking the installed build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,192.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54093 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54093 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data