CVE-2025-54099
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow exists in the Windows Ancillary Function Driver (AFD.sys), which handles WinSock network communications. A local, authorized attacker can exploit this overflow to execute code with elevated privileges, potentially achieving SYSTEM-level access on the affected Windows system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.21128< 10.0.14393.8422< 10.0.17763.7792< 10.0.19044.6332< 10.0.19045.6332< 10.0.22621.5909< 10.0.22631.5909< 10.0.26100.6508CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version and build numberRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the installed Windows build. Compare the build number to the affected version ranges: Windows 10 1507 must be <10.0.10240.21128, 1607 must be <10.0.14393.8422, 1809 must be <10.0.17763.7792, 21h2 must be <10.0.19044.6332, 22h2 must be <10.0.19045.6332; Windows 11 22h2 must be <10.0.22621.5909, 23h2 must be <10.0.22631.5909, 24h2 must be <10.0.26100.6508.Affected if The installed build number falls below any of the threshold builds listed for the corresponding Windows version.
-
Verify AFD.sys driver file versionLocate AFD.sys in the system32\drivers folder (typically C:\Windows\System32\drivers\AFD.sys), right-click and select Properties, then check the File Version field. Alternatively, run 'driverquery /v | findstr AFD' to query the driver module.Affected if The AFD.sys file version corresponds to a Windows build that is below the patched versions listed in the affected ranges.
-
Confirm security update installation statusRun 'powershell "Get-HotFix | Where-Object {$_.Description -like '*Security*'} | Sort-Object InstalledOn -Descending | Select-Object -First 5" to list recently installed security updates, or check Windows Update history for the specific security patch addressing this vulnerability.Affected if The specific security update for CVE-2025-54099 is not installed, and the system build remains in the vulnerable range.
The system is affected if it runs any Windows 10 or Windows 11 version with a build number lower than the threshold for its respective release, and the corresponding security update is not installed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2112810.0.14393.842210.0.17763.7792
Apply the relevant Microsoft Windows security update to patch the AFD.sys driver. As this is a local privilege escalation vulnerability, prioritize patching systems with privileged user access and ensure standard user accounts follow least-privilege principles.
Windows 10 1507: 10.0.10240.21128+ | Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.8422+ | Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.7792+ | Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.6332+ | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.6332+ | Windows 11 22h2: 10.0.22621.5909+ | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.5909+ | Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.6508+
- 1. Open Windows Settings on the affected system
- 2. Navigate to Windows Update (Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update)
- 3. Click 'Check for updates' to fetch the latest security patches
- 4. Install all available updates, particularly the security update containing the fix for CVE-2025-54099
- 5. Restart the system when prompted to complete the installation
- 6. Verify the installed build version matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54099 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54099 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data