CVE-2025-54104
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAccess of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Windows Defender Firewall Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA type confusion vulnerability in the Windows Defender Firewall Service allows a locally authorized attacker to elevate privileges by exploiting how the service handles objects of incompatible types. The vulnerability stems from the service not properly validating object types before use, potentially allowing memory corruption that can be leveraged for privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.21128< 10.0.14393.8422< 10.0.17763.7792< 10.0.19044.6332< 10.0.19045.6332< 10.0.22621.5909< 10.0.22631.5909< 10.0.26100.6508CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Windows build versionOpen Command Prompt or PowerShell and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' to retrieve the full build number including the 5-digit build (e.g., 10.0.19045.6332)Affected if Your build number is less than the corresponding threshold for your Windows release (1507 < 10240.21128, 1607 < 14393.8422, 1809 < 17763.7792, 21h2 < 19044.6332, 22h2 < 19045.6332, 22h2 < 22621.5909, 23h2 < 22631.5909, 24h2 < 26100.6508)
-
Identify Windows release versionRun 'winver' to see your specific Windows 10/11 release (such as 1507, 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2, 23h2, or 24h2) displayed in theAbout Windows dialogAffected if You are on any of the affected releases listed in the CVE and your build falls below the patched threshold for that release
-
Verify Windows Defender Firewall service statusOpen Services.msc or run 'Get-Service MpsSvc' in PowerShell to check if the Windows Defender Firewall service (MpsSvc) is installed and runningAffected if The service exists on your system (standard on all affected Windows versions); the vulnerability applies regardless of enabled/disabled state as it concerns internal object handling
You are affected if your Windows build version is lower than the patched build for your specific Windows release, regardless of firewall configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2112810.0.14393.842210.0.17763.7792
Apply Microsoft security updates immediately upon release for Windows Defender Firewall Service. Review and limit local user permissions following least-privilege principles to reduce the attack surface.
Apply Windows security updates to reach the minimum fixed build number for your Windows version; the fixes are delivered through Microsoft's monthly cumulative updates (Patch Tuesday)
- Identify the Windows version and build number by running `winver` or `systeminfo` in Command Prompt
- Open Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install all available updates
- After installation, verify the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release: Windows 10 1507 should be 10.0.10240.21128 or higher, Windows 10 1607 should be 10.0.14393.8422 or higher, Windows 10 1809 should be 10.0.17763.7792 or higher, Windows 10 21h2 should be 10.0.19044.6332 or higher, Windows 10 22h2 should be 10.0.19045.6332 or higher, Windows 11 22h2 should be 1
- Restart the system if prompted to complete the update installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54104 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54104 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data