Insufficiently Protected CredentialsWeakness · CWE-522

CVE-2025-54428

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-28
Patch available
A vendor patch is available. No clean upgrade release — apply the published patch.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
RevelaCode is an AI-powered faith-tech project that decodes biblical verses, prophecies and global events into accessible language. In versions below 1.0.1, a valid MongoDB Atlas URI with embedded username and password was accidentally committed to the public repository. This could allow unauthorized access to production or staging databases, potentially leading to data exfiltration, modification, or deletion. This is fixed in version 1.0.1. Workarounds include: immediately rotating credentials for the exposed database user, using a secret manager (like Vault, Doppler, AWS Secrets Manager, etc.) instead of storing secrets directly in code, or auditing recent access logs for suspicious activity.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A valid MongoDB Atlas connection URI containing embedded credentials was accidentally committed to a public repository in RevelaCode versions below 1.0.1, allowing potential attackers to access and manipulate production or staging databases.

MitigationImmediately rotate the exposed database credentials and migrate to a secure secret management solution (e.g., Vault, Doppler, AWS Secrets Manager) to prevent future credential exposures.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check RevelaCode version
    Inspect the package.json, version file, or software bill of materials (SBOM) for the installed RevelaCode version and compare it to 1.0.1
    Affected if The installed version is below 1.0.1
  2. Scan for MongoDB Atlas connection strings in repository
    Search the repository for strings matching pattern 'mongodb+srv://' or 'mongodb://' using grep, git grep, or a secret scanning tool
    Affected if Any MongoDB connection URIs are found in the repository history or current state
  3. Verify credentials are embedded in connection URI
    Examine any found MongoDB connection strings to determine if they contain username and password in the format 'mongodb+srv://user:password@cluster'
    Affected if The connection URI contains plaintext credentials (username:password@)

You are affected if RevelaCode version is below 1.0.1 AND a MongoDB Atlas connection URI with embedded credentials exists in the repository, especially if the repository is public.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Patch available Apply the vendor patch
Vendor patch github.com →
Interim mitigation

Immediately rotate the exposed database credentials and migrate to a secure secret management solution (e.g., Vault, Doppler, AWS Secrets Manager) to prevent future credential exposures.

Recommended fix High confidence

version 1.0.1

  1. Upgrade to version 1.0.1 of RevelaCode-Backend to obtain the fixed code without exposed credentials
  2. Immediately rotate the MongoDB Atlas credentials that were exposed in the repository - generate new username/password for the database user
  3. Verify that the new version uses environment variables or a secret manager instead of hardcoded credentials
  4. Audit MongoDB Atlas access logs for any unauthorized access or suspicious activity during the period the credentials were exposed
  5. Implement a secret management solution (e.g., Vault, Doppler, AWS Secrets Manager) to store database credentials outside of source code

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,000
Get the patch applied

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54428 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54428 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data