Magicinfo 9 ServerApplication · Samsung

CVE-2025-54455

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 21.1080.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Use of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability in Samsung Electronics MagicINFO 9 Server allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects MagicINFO 9 Server: less than 21.1080.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

MagicINFO 9 Server versions before 21.1080.0 contain hard-coded credentials embedded in the application code or configuration. Attackers can use these credentials to authenticate to the server without legitimate user credentials, achieving full authentication bypass.

MitigationUpdate MagicINFO 9 Server to version 21.1080.0 or later to remove the hard-coded credentials. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the management interface and implement alternative authentication controls.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Magicinfo 9 ServerApplication
Affected:< 21.1080.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed MagicINFO 9 Server version
    Locate the version information through the application web interface, about page, or check installation directories for version manifest files. Consult vendor documentation for version retrieval commands or files.
    Affected if The installed version is below 21.1080.0
  2. Determine if the management interface is network-accessible
    Review network configuration and firewall rules to confirm whether the MagicINFO management interface is reachable from untrusted networks. Check for exposed ports typically used by the application.
    Affected if The management interface is accessible from networks outside the trusted administrative zone
  3. Inspect application configuration files for embedded credentials
    Search configuration and property files within the MagicINFO installation directory for hard-coded username and password values. Look for default or static credential patterns in XML, properties, or config files.
    Affected if Hard-coded credentials are found in configuration files or the application code contains static authentication values

If the installed MagicINFO 9 Server version is below 21.1080.0 and the management interface is network-accessible, the environment is likely affected by this hard-coded credential vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 21.1080.0 or later
Fixed in 21.1080.0
Interim mitigation

Update MagicINFO 9 Server to version 21.1080.0 or later to remove the hard-coded credentials. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the management interface and implement alternative authentication controls.

Recommended fix High confidence

21.1080.0 or later

  1. Upgrade MagicINFO 9 Server to version 21.1080.0 or later to resolve the hard-coded credentials vulnerability.
  2. Verify the upgrade was successful by confirming the server version after installation.
  3. Test authentication functionality to ensure the authentication bypass vulnerability is remediated.
  4. Ensure the upgraded server is running the latest security configuration.

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Magicinfo 9 Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54455 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54455 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data