CVE-2025-54479
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen a classification profile is configured on a virtual server without an HTTP or HTTP/2 profile, undisclosed requests can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn F5 BIG-IP, when a classification profile is attached to a virtual server without an accompanying HTTP or HTTP/2 profile, specific undisclosed requests can trigger a crash in the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM), resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.1.0, <= 1.4.0= 2.0.0= 2.0.1= 2.0.2= 2.1.0= 2.0.0= 2.1.0>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.8>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.6.1>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.3= 17.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed F5 product and versionUse the command 'tmsh show sys version' or check the management console for the exact BIG-IP Next or Policy Enforcement Manager versionAffected if The installed version falls within the ranges: Big Ip Next Cloud Native (1.1.0-1.4.0, 2.0.0-2.0.2, 2.1.0), Big Ip Next For Kubernetes (2.0.0, 2.1.0), Policy Enforcement Manager (15.1.0-15.1.10.7, 16.1.0-16.1.6.0, 17.1.0-17.2.x, 17.5.0)
-
List all virtual servers with classification profilesUse 'tmsh list ltm virtual' combined with profile classification or check the GUI under Virtual Servers > Profiles to identify which virtual servers have a classification profile appliedAffected if Any virtual server has a classification profile attached
-
Verify HTTP or HTTP/2 profile presence on virtual serversFor each virtual server with a classification profile, examine the profile configuration using 'tmsh list ltm virtual <name>' or the GUI to confirm whether an HTTP or HTTP/2 profile is also assignedAffected if A virtual server has a classification profile but NO HTTP or HTTP/2 profile configured
-
Confirm the vulnerability conditionCross-reference the findings: identify virtual servers where classification is present but HTTP/HTTP2 is absent, creating the crash conditionAffected if At least one virtual server has a classification profile without an accompanying HTTP or HTTP/2 profile
You are affected if your F5 BIG-IP version is within the affected ranges AND you have virtual servers with classification profiles that lack HTTP or HTTP/2 profiles configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.1.10.816.1.6.117.1.3
Ensure all virtual servers with classification profiles also have HTTP or HTTP/2 profiles configured to prevent TMM termination from malformed requests.
Big Ip Next Cloud Native Network Functions: 1.4.1+ or 2.0.3+; Big Ip Next For Kubernetes: 2.1.1+; Big Ip Policy Enforcement Manager: 15.1.10.8+, 16.1.6.1+, 17.1.3+, or 17.6.0+
- 1. Identify the exact deployed version of Big Ip Next Cloud Native Network Functions, Big Ip Next For Kubernetes, or Big Ip Policy Enforcement Manager using the command line interface or management console.
- 2. For Big Ip Next Cloud Native Network Functions: Upgrade to version 1.4.1 or later, or version 2.0.3 or later.
- 3. For Big Ip Next For Kubernetes: Upgrade to version 2.1.1 or later.
- 4. For Big Ip Policy Enforcement Manager: Upgrade to version 15.1.10.8 or later, 16.1.6.1 or later, 17.1.3 or later, or 17.6.0 or later (if available).
- 5. After upgrading, verify that classification profiles are properly configured with associated HTTP or HTTP/2 profiles on virtual servers to prevent recurrence.
- 6. Test the configuration in a staging environment before deploying to production.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54479 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54479 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data