LibbiosigApplication · Libbiosig Project

CVE-2025-54483

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.9.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.0 and Master Branch (35a819fa). A specially crafted MFER file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability manifests on line 8759 of biosig.c on the current master branch (35a819fa), when the Tag is 5: else if (tag==5) //0x05: number of channels { uint16_t oldNS=hdr->NS; if (len>4) fprintf(stderr,"Warning MFER tag5 incorrect length %i>4\n",len); curPos += ifread(buf,1,len,hdr);

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A stack-based buffer overflow exists in libbiosig's MFER file parser (biosig.c line 8759). When parsing MFER files with Tag=5 (number of channels), the code reads len bytes into a fixed-size buffer without proper bounds checking. If len exceeds the buffer size, data overflows onto the stack, allowing arbitrary code execution.

MitigationApply vendor patch or update libbiosig to latest version. If no patch available, implement bounds validation on the len parameter before ifread() call to ensure it does not exceed buffer capacity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
LibbiosigApplication
Affected:< 3.9.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if libbiosig is in use
    Search for libbiosig library files (.so, .a, .dll) or header files in the system, or check if any application links against libbiosig
    Affected if libbiosig library files or development headers are present on the system
  2. Determine installed libbiosig version
    Check the library version through package manager, or inspect library metadata, or run 'strings' on the library file for version strings
    Affected if The version is lower than 3.9.1
  3. Verify MFER file format support is enabled
    Check application configuration or code that uses biosig for whether MFER format decoding is invoked; inspect the biosig library for MFER-related function calls
    Affected if The application or library processes MFER files using the biosig MFER parser
  4. Inspect the vulnerable code location
    If source code is available, examine biosig.c around line 8759 for the Tag=5 parsing logic and the ifread() call with len parameter into fixed buffer
    Affected if The source code shows the unbounded read without bounds validation on len before line 8759
  5. Check for suspicious crash logs or exploit indicators
    Review application logs, crash dumps, or system logs for stack buffer overflow errors related to MFER file processing
    Affected if Buffer overflow crashes are logged when processing MFER files with Tag=5 containing unexpectedly large len values

The environment is affected if libbiosig version is below 3.9.1 and MFER file format parsing is enabled and used to process untrusted MFER files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.9.1 or later
Fixed in 3.9.1
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor patch or update libbiosig to latest version. If no patch available, implement bounds validation on the len parameter before ifread() call to ensure it does not exceed buffer capacity.

Recommended fix High confidence

libbiosig 3.9.1

  1. Upgrade libbiosig to version 3.9.1 or later

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Libbiosig Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54483 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54483 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data