CVE-2025-54490
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.0 and Master Branch (35a819fa). A specially crafted MFER file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability manifests on line 9090 of biosig.c on the current master branch (35a819fa), when the Tag is 64: else if (tag==64) //0x40 { // preamble char tmp[256]; // [1] curPos += ifread(tmp,1,len,hdr); In this case, the overflowed buffer is the newly-declared `tmp` \[1\] instead of `buf`. While `tmp` is larger than `buf`, having a size of 256 bytes, a stack overflow can still occur in cases where `len` is encoded using multiple octets and is greater than 256.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow exists in libbiosig's MFER file parsing. When parsing MFER files with tag value 64 (0x40), the code at line 9090 of biosig.c copies data into a 256-byte stack buffer `tmp` using a length value from the file without validating that the length doesn't exceed the buffer size. If an attacker provides an MFER file where `len` exceeds 256 bytes, the stack buffer overflows, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.9.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify libbiosig installation and versionCheck for libbiosig library files and retrieve the installed version. Common locations include /usr/lib/, /usr/local/lib/, or within application bundles. Use commands like 'pkg-config --modversion biosig' or inspect the library binary metadata.Affected if libbiosig is installed and its version is below 3.9.1
-
Confirm MFER file parsing support is enabledVerify that the libbiosig build includes MFER format support. Check build configuration files, or look for MFER-related symbols or modules within the library.Affected if MFER support is compiled into or loaded by libbiosig
-
Detect MFER file processing activityMonitor or inspect for processes that parse MFER files. Check application logs, file access patterns, or configuration that specifies MFER as an input format.Affected if Applications or services process MFER files as input
-
Identify applications using libbiosigScan for executables or services that link to libbiosig. Use commands like 'ldd' on binaries or check dependency lists in application configurations.Affected if Applications dynamically or statically link to libbiosig and process MFER data
A user is affected if their environment has libbiosig version below 3.9.1 with MFER file parsing enabled and actively processing MFER files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.9.1
Do not process untrusted MFER files with libbiosig until a patch is applied. The fix requires validating that the `len` parameter from the file does not exceed the 256-byte buffer size before copying data into `tmp`.
libbiosig 3.9.1
- 1. Identify all systems and applications that use libbiosig for MFER file parsing.
- 2. Check the currently installed version of libbiosig on each affected system using package manager or by querying the library version.
- 3. Obtain libbiosig version 3.9.1 or later from the official source (https://biosig.sourceforge.net/ or official distribution channels).
- 4. Upgrade libbiosig to version 3.9.1 or newer following the project's installation instructions.
- 5. Rebuild and redeploy any applications that statically link against libbiosig.
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version.
- 7. Test MFER file parsing functionality to ensure normal operation after the upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54490 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54490 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data