CVE-2025-54517
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut of bounds write in AMD AMDGV_CMD_GET_DIAG_DATA ioctl handler could allow a local user to escalate privileges via remote code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOut-of-bounds write vulnerability in the AMDGV_CMD_GET_DIAG_DATA ioctl handler within AMD's graphics virtualization driver. The memory corruption flaw allows a local attacker to write beyond allocated buffer boundaries, potentially achieving privilege escalation to execute code with elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if AMD graphics virtualization driver is loadedCheck for amdgpu kernel module: lsmod | grep amdgpu, or check /sys/module/amdgpu/version if it existsAffected if The amdgpu module is loaded without the vendor patch applied to the AMDGV_CMD_GET_DIAG_DATA ioctl handler
-
Determine the installed AMDGPU driver versionCheck /sys/module/amdgpu/version or run 'modinfo amdgpu' and look at the version fieldAffected if The driver version matches or falls within an unpatched version range for the graphics virtualization component
-
Verify the presence of AMDGV ioctl interfaceCheck for AMDGV-related device nodes or ioctl entry points: ls -la /dev/dri/* or check for amdgv-related entries in /proc or /sysAffected if The AMDGV_CMD_GET_DIAG_DATA ioctl interface exists and is accessible to local users
-
Check for diagnostic data ioctl access permissionsReview permissions on graphics device nodes and verify which local users have access to /dev/dri/cardX or related AMD virtualization interfacesAffected if Non-privileged local users can access the vulnerable ioctl handler interface
A system is affected if it runs an unpatched AMD graphics virtualization driver (amdgpu) with the AMDGV_CMD_GET_DIAG_DATA ioctl interface accessible to local users, allowing potential out-of-bounds memory writes for privilege escalation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the AMD vendor patch for the graphics virtualization driver; until patched, restrict local user access to systems with the vulnerable driver and monitor for exploitation attempts.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54517 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54517 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data