PHP File Inclusion (RFI/LFI)Weakness · CWE-98

CVE-2025-54709

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in uxper Sala. This issue affects Sala: from n/a through 1.1.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A Remote File Inclusion (RFI) vulnerability in uxper Sala (versions through 1.1.6) allows attackers to inject arbitrary file paths into PHP include/require statements due to improper control of filename parameters. This can lead to remote code execution if attacker-controlled files are loaded.

MitigationImplement strict input validation and whitelist-based filtering on all include/require statements; disable allow_url_fopen and allow_url_include in PHP configuration; update to a patched version when available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify uxper Sala installation
    Locate the uxper Sala application files on the server; common paths may include web root directories or application-specific folders named 'uxper' or 'sala'. Look for index.php or configuration files that indicate this application.
    Affected if The uxper Sala application is present on the server.
  2. Determine installed version
    Open the application's main index.php, composer.json, or any version configuration file to read the reported version number. Compare this against the affected range of 1.1.6 and below.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.1.6 or any earlier version.
  3. Identify vulnerable include/require patterns
    Search the application source code for PHP include, require, include_once, or require_once statements. Examine these statements to determine if they accept dynamic input, particularly from GET, POST, or REQUEST superglobals, without proper sanitization.
    Affected if User-supplied input (from query parameters or form data) flows directly into include/require statements without validation.
  4. Audit input handling logic
    Trace the data flow from user input to the include/require statements found in the previous step. Check if the application implements any filtering, whitelisting, or path validation on the filename parameter before it is used.
    Affected if No strict input validation or whitelist-based filtering is applied to the filename parameter before inclusion.
  5. Review PHP configuration
    Check the php.ini file or use phpinfo() to inspect the values of allow_url_fopen and allow_url_include settings. These control whether PHP can include files from remote URLs.
    Affected if allow_url_fopen or allow_url_include is enabled, allowing remote file inclusion.

A user is affected if uxper Sala version 1.1.6 or lower is installed AND the application passes unsanitized user input into PHP include/require statements, enabling an attacker to control which files get loaded and potentially execute arbitrary code.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation and whitelist-based filtering on all include/require statements; disable allow_url_fopen and allow_url_include in PHP configuration; update to a patched version when available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54709 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54709 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data