CVE-2025-54763
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFutureNet MA and IP-K series provided by Century Systems Co., Ltd. contain an OS command Injection vulnerability. A user who logs in to the Web UI of the product may execute an arbitrary OS command.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in the web UI of FutureNet MA and IP-K series routers. An authenticated user can inject arbitrary OS commands through unsanitized input fields in the web interface, allowing execution with the privileges of the web server process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the router's web interface or check the device label/firmware to confirm it is a FutureNet MA or IP-K series router. Alternatively, use SNMP or the admin CLI to query the device model information.Affected if The device is a FutureNet MA or IP-K series router.
-
Verify web UI accessibilityDetermine if the router's web interface (HTTP/HTTPS on ports 80/443 or custom ports) is reachable from network locations that are not trusted. Check firewall rules, ACLs, or NAT configurations that expose the web UI.Affected if The web UI is exposed to untrusted network segments or the internet.
-
Confirm authentication is enforcedCheck whether the router requires valid credentials to access the web interface. Attempt an unauthenticated request to the web UI or review authentication settings in the router configuration.Affected if The web UI allows unauthenticated access or uses weak/default credentials.
-
Review input validation in web UI fieldsIf you have access, log in to the web UI and examine input fields in configuration pages (such as network settings, diagnostic tools, or admin functions). Look for fields that accept parameters and are not clearly sanitized.Affected if The web UI contains input fields that do not appear to sanitize special characters (such as ;, |, &, or backticks) before passing them to system calls.
You are affected if your device is a FutureNet MA or IP-K series router with its web UI exposed to untrusted networks and accessible without proper access controls, particularly if the web interface accepts unsanitized input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patch when available; until then, restrict network access to the web UI to trusted IP addresses only and enforce strong authentication credentials.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54763 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54763 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data