EvmapaApplication

CVE-2025-54816

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-01-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
This vulnerability occurs when a WebSocket endpoint does not enforce proper authentication mechanisms, allowing unauthorized users to establish connections. As a result, attackers can exploit this weakness to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data or perform unauthorized actions. Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to privilege escalation and potentially compromise the security of the entire system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an authentication bypass vulnerability where a WebSocket endpoint does not enforce authentication, allowing any user to establish a connection without credentials. Attackers can connect and potentially access sensitive data or perform unauthorized actions.

MitigationImplement proper authentication mechanisms (such as token validation, session checking, or credential exchange) on the WebSocket endpoint before allowing connections.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
EvmapaApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify WebSocket endpoint exposure
    Review your network configuration and running services to determine if a WebSocket endpoint for Evmapa Evmapa is exposed and accessible on your network. Check service listening ports and any reverse proxy or load balancer configurations that may expose WebSocket routes.
    Affected if A WebSocket endpoint for Evmapa Evmapa is accessible from your network without authentication controls at the network layer.
  2. Locate WebSocket configuration files
    Search your Evmapa Evmapa installation directory for configuration files that define WebSocket endpoints, authentication settings, or connection handlers. Look for files related to websocket, socket, or realtime connections.
    Affected if Configuration files exist that define WebSocket endpoints without authentication enforcement rules.
  3. Examine authentication settings for WebSocket
    Inspect the WebSocket configuration or source code to verify whether authentication mechanisms such as token validation, session checking, or credential exchange are implemented before allowing connections.
    Affected if The WebSocket endpoint lacks authentication enforcement logic or allows connections to proceed without valid credentials.
  4. Test unauthenticated WebSocket connection
    Use a WebSocket client tool (such as wscat or a custom script) to attempt a connection to the Evmapa Evmapa WebSocket endpoint without providing any credentials or authentication tokens.
    Affected if The connection is successfully established without requiring any form of authentication.

Your environment is affected if the Evmapa Evmapa WebSocket endpoint is accessible and accepts connections without requiring authentication credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authentication mechanisms (such as token validation, session checking, or credential exchange) on the WebSocket endpoint before allowing connections.

Fix this in Evmapa Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,560
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54816 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54816 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data