CVE-2025-54925
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists that could cause unauthorized access to sensitive data when an attacker configures the application to access a malicious url.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability (CWE-918) where an attacker can manipulate the application to make requests to malicious URLs, potentially gaining unauthorized access to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, or sensitive data behind firewalls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify URL-fetching featuresLocate all functionality that makes HTTP requests based on user input, such as URL previews, webhooks, proxy features, import from URL, or any feature that accepts a URL and fetches its content.Affected if The application processes user-supplied URLs to make outbound requests.
-
Review URL validation logicExamine the code or configuration that handles URL processing. Check if there is input validation that validates, sanitizes, or allowlists URLs before making the request.Affected if No URL validation, sanitization, or allowlisting is implemented on user-supplied URLs.
-
Check for internal network accessTest the URL-fetching feature by providing URLs to internal resources such as localhost, 127.0.0.1, internal IP ranges (192.168.x.x, 10.x.x.x, 172.16-31.x.x), or cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254).Affected if The application successfully makes requests to internal or cloud metadata endpoints.
-
Inspect request configurationReview the application configuration for any settings related to URL fetching, HTTP clients, or request libraries. Check if there are restrictions on which domains or IP addresses can be accessed.Affected if No restrictions are configured on outbound request destinations.
-
Verify network segmentationCheck if the server running the application is network-segmented from sensitive internal services, cloud metadata services, and database servers.Affected if The application server can directly reach internal services or cloud metadata without network restrictions.
Your environment is affected if the application has any URL-fetching functionality that processes user input without proper validation, sanitization, allowlisting, or network restrictions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict URL allowlisting, validate and sanitize all user-supplied URLs before making requests, disable unnecessary URL fetching capabilities, and apply network segmentation to limit exposure of internal services.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54925 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54925 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data