CVE-2025-54958
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPowered BLUE 870 versions 0.20130927 and prior contain an OS command injection vulnerability. If this vulnerability is exploited, arbitrary OS commands may be executed on the affected product.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePowered BLUE 870 versions 0.20130927 and prior contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the affected device, likely through unsanitized user input being passed to system shell calls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify product and versionLocate the Powered BLUE 870 application and determine its installed version number. Check application documentation, about page, or version file for the exact version string.Affected if The installed version is 0.20130927 or any version prior to it.
-
Verify authentication is in useConfirm whether authentication is enabled for the Powered BLUE 870 interface. Check user accounts, login configuration, or session management settings.Affected if Authenticated access to the application is possible, as this CVE requires authentication to exploit.
-
Identify user input mechanismsLocate any features that accept user-supplied input and pass it to backend system calls. Look for forms, API endpoints, or configuration options that accept parameters.Affected if User input fields or parameters exist that could be processed by system shell calls.
-
Check system call implementationIf access to application source or configuration is available, inspect code that invokes system shell commands. Look for patterns where user input is concatenated directly into shell commands without sanitization.Affected if User-provided input is passed directly to system shell execution functions without input validation or use of secure API alternatives.
If the installed version is 0.20130927 or earlier and the application exposes user input functionality to authenticated users, the environment is likely affected by this command injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of Powered BLUE 870 if available. If no patch exists, implement strict input validation and replace vulnerable system call implementations with secure API alternatives that avoid shell interpretation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-54958 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-54958 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data