CVE-2025-55225
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut-of-bounds read in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to read memory contents beyond allocated buffer boundaries, potentially exposing sensitive system information over the network.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= r2all versions= r2< 10.0.14393.8422< 10.0.17763.7792< 10.0.20348.4106< 10.0.25398.1849< 10.0.26100.6508CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows Server version and build numberRun `systeminfo` or `Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object WindowsVersion,OsVersion,OsBuildNumber` to obtain the installed Windows buildAffected if Build number is below 14393.8422 (Server 2016), 17763.7792 (Server 2019), 20348.4106 (Server 2022), 25398.1849 (Server 2022 23h2), 26100.6508 (Server 2025), or if running any version of Server 2008 or Server 2012 (all versions are affected)
-
Determine if RRAS role is installedRun `Get-WindowsFeature -Name Remote-Access` or check for the presence of the RemoteAccess service via `Get-Service RemoteAccess`Affected if The Remote Access role or Routing and Remote Access (RRAS) feature is installed on the server
-
Check if RRAS service is enabled or runningRun `Get-Service RemoteAccess` and check the Status property, or inspect the service via Services.mscAffected if The RemoteAccess service is in a Running, Started, or Auto-start state on the system
The system is affected only if it is running a vulnerable Windows Server version within the affected build ranges AND has RRAS installed and enabled, exposing the out-of-bounds read vulnerability to network attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.842210.0.17763.779210.0.20348.4106
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2025-55225 through Windows Update or enterprise patch management, then verify RRAS continues to function correctly.
Upgrade to Windows Server 2016 build 10.0.14393.8422 or later, Server 2019 build 10.0.17763.7792 or later, Server 2022 build 10.0.20348.4106 or later, Server 2022 23h2 build 10.0.25398.1849 or later, or Server 2025 build 10.0.26100.6508 or later
- Identify the current Windows Server version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in command prompt
- Determine which build version is currently installed (e.g., for Server 2019, check if below 10.0.17763.7792)
- For Windows Server 2016, 2019, 2022, 2022 23h2, and 2025: Apply the latest Windows Update or manually download and install the security update corresponding to build 10.0.14393.8422, 10.0.17763.7792, 10.0.20348.4106, 10.0.25398.1849, or 10.0.26100.6508 respectively
- For Windows Server 2008 and 2012: These versions are end-of-life and no longer receive security updates; migrate to a supported Windows Server version (2016 or later)
- After patching, verify the RRAS service version matches the fixed build number using 'sc queryex type= service' and check Windows Update history for the installed security update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55225 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55225 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data