Aftermarket CloudApplication · Hcltech

CVE-2025-55275

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
88/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by Admin Session Concurrency vulnerability using which an attacker can exploit concurrent sessions to hijack or impersonate an admin user.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

HCL Aftermarket DPC contains a session concurrency vulnerability in its admin authentication mechanism. The application fails to properly restrict or manage concurrent admin sessions, allowing an attacker to potentially establish a competing session or exploit race conditions to hijack or impersonate an existing admin user's session.

MitigationImplement proper session management controls including session fixation protection, enforce session expiration, limit concurrent admin sessions per user, and invalidate previous sessions upon new login or suspicious activity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Aftermarket CloudApplication
Affected:= 1.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud installation and version
    Locate the Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud application and retrieve its installed version number. This may be found in the application itself, installation directory, or system inventory software.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.0 (Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud version 1.0.0).
  2. Confirm admin authentication is enabled
    Verify that the admin authentication mechanism is active on the Aftermarket Cloud installation. Check whether admin users can authenticate to the system.
    Affected if Admin authentication is enabled and functional on the affected version.
  3. Review session management configuration
    Examine configuration files or settings related to session management within the Aftermarket Cloud application. Look for settings that control session behavior, session IDs, and session lifecycle.
    Affected if Session management configuration exists and allows multiple concurrent admin sessions without proper restriction.
  4. Check concurrent session limits
    Inspect the application or its configuration to determine whether limits are enforced on concurrent admin sessions per user account.
    Affected if No limit is enforced on how many concurrent admin sessions a single user can maintain.
  5. Verify session invalidation behavior
    Test or inspect whether previous admin sessions are invalidated when a new login occurs, or if older sessions remain active alongside new ones.
    Affected if Previous admin sessions remain active after a new login (no session fixation protection or session invalidation on new auth).

A user is affected if they are running Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud version 1.0.0 with admin authentication enabled, and the application permits multiple concurrent admin sessions without proper session invalidation or concurrency controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper session management controls including session fixation protection, enforce session expiration, limit concurrent admin sessions per user, and invalidate previous sessions upon new login or suspicious activity.

Fix this in Aftermarket Cloud Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation20.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
44.0 hours of engineering $7,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,288.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55275 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55275 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data