CVE-2025-55312
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. When pages in a PDF are deleted via JavaScript, the application may fail to properly update internal states. Subsequent annotation management operations assume these states are valid, causing dereference of invalid or released memory. This can lead to memory corruption, application crashes, and potentially allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a use-after-free vulnerability in Foxit PDF Editor for Windows. When JavaScript deletes PDF pages, the application fails to properly update internal state structures. Subsequent annotation management operations then dereference these invalid or already-released memory structures, causing corruption that can lead to code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 13.1.7.63027>= 2023.1.0.55583, <= 2023.3.0.63083>= 2024.1.0.63682, <= 2024.4.1.66479= 2025.1.0.66692>= 2023.1.0.15510, <= 2023.3.0.23028>= 2024.1.0.23997, <= 2024.4.1.27687= 2025.1.0.27937<= 2025.1.0.66692<= 2025.1.0.27937CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Foxit productOpen Control Panel > Programs and Features, or check Registry keys under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for entries containing 'Foxit PDF Editor' or 'Foxit PDF Reader'Affected if Either Foxit PDF Editor or Foxit PDF Reader is installed on the system
-
Determine exact version numberRight-click the Foxit application icon, select Properties, then look at the Version tab, or launch the application and go to Help > About to see the full version string including the build numberAffected if The installed version cannot be determined or is not visible
-
Compare against affected Editor versionsMatch the installed version string (e.g., 13.1.7.63027, 2023.1.0.55583, 2024.4.1.66479, 2025.1.0.66692) against these ranges: <= 13.1.7.63027; >= 2023.1.0.55583 AND <= 2023.3.0.63083; >= 2024.1.0.63682 AND <= 2024.4.1.66479; = 2025.1.0.66692; >= 2023.1.0.15510 AND <= 2023.3.0.23028; >= 2024.1.0.23997 AND <= 2024.4.1.27687; = 2025.1.0.27937Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges
-
Compare against affected Reader versionsMatch the installed Foxit PDF Reader version against: <= 2025.1.0.66692 OR <= 2025.1.0.27937Affected if The installed Reader version is 2025.1.0.66692 or earlier, or 2025.1.0.27937 or earlier
-
Check JavaScript execution statusLaunch Foxit, go to File > Preferences > JavaScript, or on newer versions navigate to File > Settings > JavaScript, and verify whether JavaScript is enabled or disabledAffected if JavaScript is enabled - the vulnerability requires JavaScript-triggered page deletion to trigger the use-after-free
You are affected if Foxit PDF Editor or Reader is installed with a version matching the affected ranges AND JavaScript execution is enabled in the application settings.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Foxit PDF Editor to version 13.2 or 2025.2 or later to obtain the vendor patch. Alternatively, consider disabling JavaScript execution in Foxit settings as a temporary workaround if updates are not immediately feasible.
Foxit PDF Editor 13.2+ or 2025.2+; Foxit PDF Reader 2025.2+
- 1. Open Foxit PDF Editor or PDF Reader application
- 2. Navigate to the Help menu or Account settings
- 3. Check the current version by selecting 'About Foxit PDF Editor' or 'About Foxit PDF Reader'
- 4. Download the fixed version from the official Foxit website (www.foxit.com) - ensure version 13.2 or later, or version 2025.2 or later
- 5. Close all Foxit applications
- 6. Run the installer for the new version
- 7. Follow the installation wizard prompts to complete the upgrade
- 8. After installation, verify the new version by checking 'About' to confirm the fix is applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55312 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55312 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data