CVE-2025-55313
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows and macOS before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. They allow potential arbitrary code execution when processing crafted PDF files. The vulnerability stems from insufficient handling of memory allocation failures after assigning an extremely large value to a form field's charLimit property via JavaScript. This can result in memory corruption and may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code by persuading a user to open a malicious file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFoxit PDF Editor contains a memory corruption vulnerability where assigning an extremely large value to a form field's charLimit property via JavaScript causes improper handling of memory allocation failures, leading to memory corruption that can be leveraged for arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2023.1.0.15510, <= 2023.3.0.23028>= 2024.1.0.23997, <= 2024.4.1.27687= 2025.1.0.27937<= 13.1.7.63027>= 2023.1.0.55583, <= 2023.3.0.63083>= 2024.1.0.63682, <= 2024.4.1.66479= 2025.1.0.66692<= 2025.1.0.27937<= 2025.1.0.66692CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Foxit product and versionOpen Foxit PDF Editor or Reader, then go to Help > About Foxit PDF Editor/Reader to view the exact version number. Alternatively, right-click the application in the Start menu and select Properties to view the version.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: >= 2023.1.0.15510 and <= 2023.3.0.23028; >= 2024.1.0.23997 and <= 2024.4.1.27687; = 2025.1.0.27937; <= 13.1.7.63027; >= 2023.1.0.55583 and <= 2023.3.0.63083; >= 2024.1.0.63682 and <= 2024.4.1.66479; = 2025.1.0.66692 for Editor; or <= 2025.1.0.2
-
Verify JavaScript execution is enabled in FoxitIn Foxit PDF Editor/Reader, go to File > Preferences > JavaScript. Confirm whether the option 'Enable Adobe JavaScript' is checked.Affected if JavaScript execution is enabled, as the vulnerability is triggered by assigning a large value to a form field's charLimit property via JavaScript.
-
Check for PDF forms with JavaScript usageOpen any PDF forms or documents you work with. In Foxit, go to Form > JavaScript Actions to see if any JavaScript scripts are attached to form fields or document events.Affected if The document contains form fields with JavaScript actions, particularly those that manipulate the charLimit property, as this is the specific attack vector for this vulnerability.
You are affected if you are running a Foxit PDF Editor or Reader version within the affected ranges listed above and JavaScript execution is enabled in the application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Foxit PDF Editor to version 13.2 or 2025.2 or later. Until patched, avoid opening untrusted PDF files and consider disabling JavaScript execution in the application if acceptable for your use case.
Foxit PDF Editor 13.2+ or 2025.2+; Foxit PDF Reader 2025.2+
- Identify the currently installed Foxit PDF Editor or Reader version via Help > About
- Navigate to the official Foxit website (www.foxit.com) and download the latest version (13.2 or later for versioned releases, or 2025.2 or later for year-based releases)
- Uninstall the current vulnerable version of Foxit PDF Editor or Reader
- Install the newly downloaded fixed version (13.2+/2025.2+)
- Verify the installation by checking Help > About to confirm the version number
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55313 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55313 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data