CVE-2025-55325
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer over-read in Windows Storage Management Provider allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer over-read vulnerability exists in the Windows Storage Management Provider that allows an authorized local attacker to read sensitive information from memory beyond the intended buffer boundaries. This is a memory safety flaw that enables information disclosure without requiring code execution or privilege escalation beyond the attacker's existing authorized access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.21161< 10.0.14393.8519< 10.0.17763.7919< 10.0.19044.6456< 10.0.19045.6456< 10.0.22621.6060< 10.0.22631.6060< 10.0.26100.6899CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows version and build numberRun 'winver' or execute 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' in Command Prompt to obtain the exact Windows version and build number.Affected if The detected version and build number fall below any of the following thresholds: 10.0.10240.21161 (1507), 10.0.14393.8519 (1607), 10.0.17763.7919 (1809), 10.0.19044.6456 (21h2), 10.0.19045.6456 (22h2), 10.0.22621.6060 (11 22h2), 10.0.22631.6060 (11 23h2), or 10.0.26100.6899 (11 24h2).
-
Verify Windows Storage Management Provider component is presentCheck for the presence of the Storage Management Provider service by running 'Get-Service -Name *Storage*' or 'Get-ItemProperty -Path 'HKLM:\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\StorSvc' -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue' in PowerShell.Affected if The Windows Storage Management Provider (StorSvc) service or component is installed on the system.
-
Confirm the vulnerable component versionQuery the file version of storvsc.sys or storSvc.dll in the System32 directory using 'Get-Item C:\Windows\System32\storSvc.dll | Format-List VersionInfo' or similar file version inspection.Affected if The component version cannot be determined or is lower than the version containing the security fix.
A system is affected if it runs any of the specified Windows versions with a build number below the thresholds listed AND has the Windows Storage Management Provider component present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2116110.0.14393.851910.0.17763.7919
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2025-55325 when released. Until then, restrict local access to trusted, authorized users only and monitor for suspicious access patterns to the Windows Storage Management Provider.
Windows 10 1507: 10.0.10240.21161 | Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.8519 | Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.7919 | Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.6456 | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.6456 | Windows 11 22h2: 10.0.22621.6060 | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.6060 | Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.6899
- Identify the current Windows version by running 'winver' or checking System Information
- Determine which Windows 10 or 11 version and build is currently installed
- Apply the appropriate Microsoft security update for this vulnerability (KB reference available at msrc.microsoft.com)
- Restart the system after applying the update
- Verify the installed version meets or exceeds the minimum fixed build version for your Windows release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55325 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55325 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data