CVE-2025-55619
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedReolink v4.54.0.4.20250526 was discovered to contain a hardcoded encryption key and initialization vector. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to decrypt access tokens and web session tokens stored inside the app via reverse engineering.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceReolink mobile application v4.54.0.4.20250526 contains a hardcoded encryption key and initialization vector (IV) embedded in the app binary. An attacker who obtains the app through reverse engineering can extract these cryptographic secrets and use them to decrypt sensitive access tokens and web session tokens stored locally by the application, enabling session hijacking and unauthorized account access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.54.0.4.20250526CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Reolink app is installedCheck your device's installed applications list to confirm the Reolink mobile app is presentAffected if The Reolink app is installed on the device
-
Identify installed app versionOpen your device's app management settings (Android: Settings > Apps > Reolink, iOS: Settings > General > iPhone Storage) and locate the version number fieldAffected if Unable to retrieve version information from the app
-
Compare version to affected releaseCompare the installed version number to 4.54.0.4.20250526 - verify if they match exactlyAffected if The installed version equals exactly 4.54.0.4.20250526
If the installed Reolink mobile app version is exactly 4.54.0.4.20250526, the hardcoded cryptographic key vulnerability is present in your environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRemove hardcoded encryption keys from the application code and implement proper key management using platform-specific secure storage mechanisms (Android Keystore or iOS Keychain) with per-instance or per-installation key generation.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation20.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA5.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,520.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55619 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55619 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data