CVE-2025-55685
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse after free in Windows PrintWorkflowUserSvc allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability exists in Windows PrintWorkflowUserSvc where the service fails to properly manage memory lifecycle, allowing an attacker who already has local access to free memory and then access it after it has been freed, leading to privilege escalation from their current authorization level to SYSTEM or equivalent privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.19044.6456< 10.0.19045.6456< 10.0.22621.6060< 10.0.22631.6060< 10.0.26100.6899< 10.0.26200.6899< 10.0.20348.4294< 10.0.25398.1913CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version numberRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to get the exact Windows build numberAffected if The build number falls below the patched versions (19044.6456, 19045.6456, 22621.6060, 22631.6060, 26100.6899, 26200.6899, 20348.4294, 25398.1913 depending on your Windows edition)
-
Confirm PrintWorkflowUserSvc existsRun 'Get-Service PrintWorkflowUserSvc' in PowerShell or check Services.msc for 'PrintWorkflowUserSvc'Affected if The service exists on the system (it is present by default in affected Windows versions)
-
Verify service statusRun 'Get-Service PrintWorkflowUserSvc | Select-Object Status, StartType' in PowerShellAffected if The service is running (even if stopped, the vulnerable code is present in unpatched installations)
-
Check installed Windows security updatesRun 'Get-HotFix | Where-Object {$_.Description -like "Security Update"} | Sort-Object InstalledOn -Descending | Select-Object -First 5' to list recent security patchesAffected if The most recent security update predates the patch date for this CVE, or no relevant update is installed
You are affected if your Windows build number is lower than the version thresholds listed and the PrintWorkflowUserSvc service is present on your system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.19044.645610.0.19045.645610.0.20348.4294
Apply the latest Windows security updates from Microsoft KB. Until patched, limit local access to untrusted users and monitor for suspicious processes interacting with the PrintWorkflowUserSvc.
Windows 10 21h2: Build 10.0.19044.6456 or later | Windows 10 22h2: Build 10.0.19045.6456 or later | Windows 11 22h2: Build 10.0.22621.6060 or later | Windows 11 23h2: Build 10.0.22631.6060 or later | Windows 11 24h2: Build 10.0.26100.6899 or later | Windows 11 25h2: Build 10.0.26200.6899 or later |
- 1. Identify the current Windows version by running `winver` or `systeminfo` in Command Prompt
- 2. Determine the appropriate update based on your Windows version from the fixed version list
- 3. Open Settings > Windows Update and check for updates, or manually download and install the corresponding Cumulative Update from the Microsoft Update Catalog (https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com)
- 4. For enterprise environments, deploy the update via Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) or Group Policy
- 5. Restart the system when prompted to complete the installation
- 6. Verify the fix by confirming the Windows build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55685 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55685 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data