CVE-2025-5620
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in D-Link DIR-816 1.10CNB05. Affected is the function setipsec_config of the file /goform/setipsec_config. The manipulation of the argument localIP/remoteIP leads to os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in D-Link DIR-816 router (firmware 1.10CNB05) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via the localIP/remoteIP parameters in the /goform/setipsec_config endpoint. The IPSec configuration function fails to sanitize user input before passing it to system shell commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.10cnb05CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the router web interface or check the device label to confirm it is a D-Link DIR-816 model.Affected if The device is not a D-Link DIR-816 router.
-
Check the firmware versionLog into the router web interface and navigate to the Status or System section to view the firmware version. Alternatively, check the firmware file name if you have access to the firmware binary.Affected if The firmware version is NOT 1.10CNB05 exactly.
-
Verify IPSec VPN functionality is enabledLog into the router web interface and check the VPN or IPSec settings. Look for any configured IPSec VPN tunnels or policies.Affected if IPSec VPN is not configured or enabled on the device.
-
Test for vulnerable endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access or send a request to the /goform/setipsec_config endpoint from the local network. This requires authenticated access to the router admin interface.Affected if The /goform/setipsec_config endpoint responds or accepts configuration input.
A user is affected if they have a D-Link DIR-816 router running firmware version 1.10CNB05 with IPSec VPN functionality enabled and the vulnerable endpoint accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedThis affects end-of-life hardware with no vendor support; replace affected devices with currently-supported models. If immediate replacement is not feasible, disable the IPSec VPN functionality and restrict network access to the device management interface.
Replace with a currently-supported D-Link router or alternative brand that provides active security firmware updates
- 1. Immediately disconnect the affected D-Link DIR-816 device from the network to prevent remote exploitation.
- 2. Since this firmware version (1.10cnb05) is End-of-Life and no longer supported by D-Link, there will be no official security patch.
- 3. Replace the affected device with a currently-supported router model that receives regular security updates.
- 4. If replacement is not immediately possible, restrict network access to the device's management interface by placing it behind a firewall or using ACLs to limit access to trusted IP addresses only.
- 5. Disable the IPSec functionality (the vulnerable feature) if not required, through the device's web interface.
- 6. Monitor D-Link's security advisories periodically for any unexpected firmware releases, though none are expected for this EOL product.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,296.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-5620 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-5620 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data