CVE-2025-56752
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Ruijie RG-ES series switch firmware ESW_1.0(1)B1P39 enables remote attackers to fully bypass authentication mechanisms, providing them with unrestricted access to alter administrative settings and potentially seize control of affected devices via crafted HTTP POST request to /user.cgi.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Ruijie RG-ES series switch firmware ESW_1.0(1)B1P39 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the web management interface. Attackers can send a crafted HTTP POST request to /user.cgi to completely bypass authentication and gain full administrative access to the device, allowing them to modify settings and potentially take complete control.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p27= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p35= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p39= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p27= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p35= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p39= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p27= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p35= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p39= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p27= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p35= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p39= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p27= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p35= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p39= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p27= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p35= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p39= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p27= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p35= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p39= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p27= esw_1.0\(1\)b1p35CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the switch CLI or web interface and retrieve the model name. Look for model numbers: ES228GS, ES209GC, ES205GC, ES208GC, ES206GS, ES210GS, or ES218GC.Affected if Device is a Ruijie RG-ES series switch (any of the listed models).
-
Check installed firmware versionLog into the switch web interface or CLI and locate the firmware version information. Compare against the affected versions: esw_1.0(1)b1p27, esw_1.0(1)b1p35, or esw_1.0(1)b1p39.Affected if Firmware version exactly matches one of the three affected versions listed.
-
Verify web management interface is enabledCheck the switch configuration for HTTP/HTTPS web management service status. In CLI, look for commands like 'show running-config' or 'show ip http' to confirm the web interface is active.Affected if Web management interface (HTTP on port 80 or HTTPS on port 443) is enabled and reachable.
-
Confirm /user.cgi endpoint exposureFrom a client on the same network, send a crafted HTTP POST request to http://<device_ip>/user.cgi and observe if authentication is bypassed or if the endpoint responds without credentials.Affected if The /user.cgi endpoint responds to POST requests without requiring valid authentication credentials.
User is affected if they have a Ruijie RG-ES series switch (ES228GS, ES209GC, ES205GC, ES208GC, ES206GS, ES210GS, or ES218GC) running firmware version esw_1.0(1)b1p27, esw_1.0(1)b1p35, or esw_1.0(1)b1p39 with the web management interface enabled and exposed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied firmware patch when available; until then, restrict network access to the web management interface using firewall rules or ACLs to prevent unauthorized external access.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-56752 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-56752 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data