CVE-2025-5681
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAuthorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Turtek Software Eyotek allows Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers. This issue affects Eyotek: before 23.06.2025.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) vulnerability where the application uses user-supplied input (such as a record ID or object key) to access resources without proper authorization validation. An attacker can manipulate these trusted identifiers to access or modify data belonging to other users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify endpoints that accept user-supplied identifiersReview application codebase for API endpoints, URL parameters, or request body fields that accept record IDs, object keys, or other identifiers used to retrieve or modify dataAffected if The application uses identifiers from user input to access resources without visible ownership/permission validation logic
-
Locate authorization logic for resource accessSearch source code for authorization checks (e.g., permission验证, ownership确认, access control middleware) that execute before returning requested data objectsAffected if No explicit authorization validation is found before data retrieval or modification operations
-
Verify identifier tampering is preventedTest whether modifying identifier values in requests (such as sequential IDs or object keys) allows access to resources belonging to other usersAffected if Manipulating identifiers grants unauthorized access to data not owned by the authenticated user
-
Check for consistent authorization across all data operationsAudit all create, read, update, delete operations to confirm each performs permission checks using the authenticated user's identityAffected if Some data operations lack authorization checks while others have them, creating inconsistent access control
-
Review API response for proper access controlInspect API responses and error messages to ensure they do not inadvertently expose data belonging to other users based on supplied identifiersAffected if Responses consistently return data matching the supplied identifier without verifying user permissions on that object
Your environment is affected if any endpoint uses user-supplied identifiers to access or modify data without validating that the authenticated user owns or has permission to access that specific resource.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement proper authorization checks on all resource access operations, validating that the authenticated user has permission to access the requested object before returning any data.
Eyotek version released on or after 23.06.2025 (contact Turtek Software for exact version number)
- Contact Turtek Software directly to obtain the fixed version of Eyotek released on or after June 23, 2025
- Verify with the vendor that the patch addresses CVE-2025-5681 (Authorization Bypass/IDOR)
- Schedule an upgrade window and back up the current Eyotek installation
- Apply the updated Eyotek version provided by Turtek Software
- After upgrading, test that proper authorization checks are enforced and that users can only access resources they are authorized to access
- Review audit logs to confirm the vulnerability is no longer exploitable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-5681 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-5681 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data