CVE-2025-57213
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect access control in the component orderService.queryObject of platform v1.0.0 allows attackers to access sensitive information via a crafted request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a broken access control vulnerability in the orderService.queryObject component of platform v1.0.0. The endpoint lacks proper authorization checks, allowing unauthenticated or unauthorized attackers to craft requests that access sensitive order data they should not be permitted to view.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Fuyang Lipengjun Platform is installedLocate the platform installation directory or check running services for the Fuyang Lipengjun Platform application. Common locations include /opt/, /var/www/, or as a running service.Affected if The platform is installed and running on the system
-
Determine the installed versionCheck the platform version file, about page, or application metadata. Look for version 1.0.0 specifically. Compare your installed version against the affected range (= 1.0.0).Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.0
-
Locate the orderService.queryObject componentIdentify the service endpoint or API path corresponding to orderService.queryObject in the platform codebase or API documentation.Affected if The orderService.queryObject component exists in the installation
-
Test endpoint accessibility without credentialsSend a crafted request to the orderService.queryObject endpoint without providing authentication tokens or session credentials. Observe if the request is accepted and returns order data.Affected if The endpoint accepts unauthenticated requests and returns sensitive order information that the requesting user should not have access to
-
Verify authorization controls on the endpointExamine the source code or configuration for orderService.queryObject to determine if role-based or user-specific authorization checks are enforced before returning order data.Affected if No authorization verification is performed before returning sensitive order data
A user is affected if they have Fuyang Lipengjun Platform version 1.0.0 running with the orderService.queryObject endpoint exposed and accessible without proper authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks in the orderService.queryObject method to verify the requesting user has permission to access the requested order data. Enforce role-based or user-specific access controls before returning any sensitive information.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-57213 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-57213 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data