Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-57949

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in oggix Ongkoskirim.id ongkoskirim-id allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Ongkoskirim.id: from n/a through <= 1.0.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing authorization vulnerability in Ongkoskirim.id allows attackers to access functionality or data beyond their intended privilege level due to incorrectly configured access control security levels. This broken access control issue enables unauthorized users to perform actions or view resources that should require higher privileges.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints and functions, enforce role-based access control (RBAC), and audit access control configurations to ensure security levels are correctly enforced.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Ongkoskirim.id installation
    Locate the Ongkoskirim.id application in your environment - check web server directories, application deployment locations, or container images where this software may be running
    Affected if The application is present in your environment
  2. Review access control configuration
    Inspect the application's security configuration files, particularly those defining user roles, permissions, and endpoint access rules. Look for any misconfigured security levels or missing authorization checks on sensitive functions
    Affected if Access control rules are incorrectly configured, missing, or allow privilege escalation
  3. Test sensitive endpoint access
    Attempt to access administrative functions, user data, or restricted features using a low-privilege account. Check if unauthorized actions or data viewing is possible beyond the intended privilege level
    Affected if A user with lower privileges can access or perform actions reserved for higher-privilege users
  4. Audit role-based access control implementation
    Review the RBAC implementation to verify that proper authorization checks are enforced on all sensitive endpoints and functions. Check for endpoints lacking permission validation
    Affected if Some sensitive endpoints lack proper authorization enforcement or have broken access control checks

You are affected if the Ongkoskirim.id application is present in your environment and has incorrectly configured or missing authorization checks that allow unauthorized access to privileged functionality or data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints and functions, enforce role-based access control (RBAC), and audit access control configurations to ensure security levels are correctly enforced.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Plugin version 1.0.7 or later (latest available version from WordPress repository)

  1. 1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
  2. 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
  3. 3. Locate the 'Ongkoskirim.id' plugin (ongkoskirim-id)
  4. 4. Check if an update is available for the plugin
  5. 5. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to install the latest version
  6. 6. After updating, verify the plugin is functioning correctly on the site
  7. 7. Test the access control functionality that was vulnerable to ensure the authorization issue is resolved

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
25.0 hours of engineering $4,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-57949 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-57949 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data