CVE-2025-57971
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in SALESmanago SALESmanago & Leadoo salesmanago allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects SALESmanago & Leadoo: from n/a through <= 3.8.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing Authorization vulnerability in SALESmanago & Leadoo allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. The vulnerability stems from improper or missing authorization checks that fail to properly validate user permissions before granting access to sensitive functionality or data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if SALESmanago or Leadoo is deployed in your environmentReview your installed applications, integrations, or services to confirm whether SALESmanago or Leadoo products are in use. Check software inventories, dependency lists, or vendor contracts.Affected if Either SALESmanago or Leadoo software is present in your environment.
-
Locate the API or admin interface endpointsInspect your SALESmanago or Leadoo installation documentation or network configuration to identify exposed API endpoints, admin panels, or web service interfaces. Check for publicly accessible URLs or internal service endpoints.Affected if API endpoints or admin interfaces are exposed and accessible.
-
Review access control configuration settingsIn the product admin console or configuration files, locate the security or access control settings. Look for permission levels, role definitions, or authorization enforcement options.Affected if Authorization enforcement is disabled, set to a weak level, or misconfigured.
-
Test sensitive endpoints without credentialsUsing a web request tool, attempt to access known sensitive endpoints (such as user data exports, configuration changes, or administrative functions) without providing valid authentication tokens or session credentials.Affected if Access is granted to sensitive functionality without proper authorization.
-
Inspect audit logs for unauthorized access patternsReview SALESmanago or Leadoo application logs for requests to privileged functions that originate from users lacking the required permissions or from unauthenticated sources.Affected if Logs show successful unauthorized access to protected resources.
Your environment is affected if SALESmanago or Leadoo is deployed and sensitive endpoints or admin functions can be accessed without proper authorization validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks across all endpoints and functions, enforce principle of least privilege, and validate user permissions before executing any privileged operations.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-57971 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-57971 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data