CVE-2025-57990
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in solwininfotech Blog Designer blog-designer allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Blog Designer: from n/a through <= 3.1.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing Authorization vulnerability in the Blog Designer WordPress plugin allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, likely enabling lower-privileged users or unauthenticated actors to access sensitive admin functions or settings that should require higher privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Blog Designer plugin is installed and activeNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and confirm Blog Designer plugin is present and activatedAffected if Blog Designer plugin is installed and active in the WordPress environment
-
Identify installed Blog Designer versionIn the Plugins list, locate Blog Designer and record the version number shown; compare this against any published affected version rangesAffected if Installed version falls within an affected range or cannot be verified
-
Audit WordPress user roles and capabilitiesGo to Users > All Users in WordPress admin and review which users have Administrator or Editor roles; document all accounts with elevated privilegesAffected if There are untrusted, unexpected, or unknown users with Administrator or Editor roles
-
Test for unauthorized access to admin functionsAttempt to access Blog Designer settings or admin pages using a lower-privileged account (Subscriber, Contributor, or Author) to verify if authorization controls are enforcedAffected if Users with lower privileges can access admin settings or functions that should require higher authorization
-
Review access logs for suspicious admin actionsCheck WordPress audit logs or server access logs for admin actions performed by accounts that should not have such privilegesAffected if Non-administrator accounts have performed administrative actions in the logs
The environment is affected if Blog Designer plugin is active and permits users with lower privileges to access admin functions or settings that should require higher authorization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of Blog Designer when available; in the interim, restrict admin access to trusted users only and audit user capabilities until the vulnerability is remediated.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-57990 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-57990 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data