CVE-2025-58072
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') issue exists in SS1 Ver.16.0.0.10 and earlier (Media version:16.0.0a and earlier). If this vulnerability is exploited, arbitrary files may be viewed by a remote unauthenticated attacker.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA path traversal vulnerability in SS1 Ver.16.0.0.10 and earlier allows remote unauthenticated attackers to access arbitrary files on the server by manipulating path variables to escape restricted directories.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SS1 installation and versionLocate the SS1 application and retrieve its installed version number. Common methods include checking the application metadata, version file, or running: 'ss1 --version' or 'ss1 -v' if CLI available, or inspecting the application binary/info file.Affected if The installed version is 16.0.0.10 or any version earlier than 16.0.0.10 (e.g., 16.0.0.0, 15.x, 14.x)
-
Compare version against affected rangeCompare your identified SS1 version to the affected range: versions 16.0.0.10 and earlier are vulnerable. Versions newer than 16.0.0.10 (e.g., 16.0.0a, 16.0.1, or higher) are not affected.Affected if The version is 16.0.0.10 or any version number lower than 16.0.0.10
-
Verify web interface or API exposureDetermine if SS1 exposes a web interface or API endpoint that accepts path variables. Check configuration files or running services for HTTP/HTTPS listeners that handle file path requests.Affected if The vulnerable path traversal endpoint is accessible via network (remote unauthenticated access is possible)
-
Check for path traversal mitigationInspect SS1 configuration or web server logs for any path traversal protection mechanisms (e.g., input validation, directory sandboxing). Look for security settings in config files related to path handling or file access restrictions.Affected if No path traversal protection is configured and the version is 16.0.0.10 or earlier
You are affected if SS1 version is 16.0.0.10 or earlier AND the web/API endpoint that handles path variables is exposed to network access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a version newer than 16.0.0.10 (or the fixed Media version 16.0.0a) to remediate this vulnerability.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58072 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58072 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data