CVE-2025-58073
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.1, 10.10.x <= 10.10.2, 10.5.x <= 10.5.10 fail to verify a user has permission to join a Mattermost team using the original invite token which allows any attacked to join any team on a Mattermost server regardless of restrictions via manipulating the OAuth state.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMattermost fails to properly validate the OAuth state parameter during team invitation, allowing attackers to bypass authorization checks and join any team on the server using manipulated OAuth state in conjunction with a valid invite token. This is an authorization bypass in the OAuth-based team join flow.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.5.0, < 10.5.11>= 10.10.0, < 10.10.3>= 10.11.0, < 10.11.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Mattermost Server versionRun `mattermost version` or access the system console > About > Mattermost and note the Server Version fieldAffected if The installed version falls within 10.5.0-10.5.10, 10.10.0-10.10.2, or 10.11.0-10.11.2
-
Verify OAuth authentication is configuredCheck System Console > Authentication > OAuth 2.0 or review config.json for any enabled OAuth providers (GitLab, Google, Office 365, etc.)Affected if OAuth 2.0 providers are enabled and users can authenticate via OAuth to join the server
-
Confirm team invitation system is in useCheck System Console > User Management > Teams or inspect whether 'Allow anyone to join any team with an invite link' or 'By invitation only' settings are configuredAffected if Team invitation links or invitation-only team settings are active, making the bypass relevant
-
Review recent team membership audit logsAccess System Console > Audit Logs and filter for events involving team join, invite token use, or OAuth authentication, looking for unauthorized team accessAffected if Unusual team join events exist where users joined teams without proper invitation or outside expected invitation workflow
A user is affected if their Mattermost Server version is 10.5.0-10.5.10, 10.10.0-10.10.2, or 10.11.0-10.11.2 AND OAuth authentication is enabled AND team invitations are in use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.5.1110.10.310.11.3
Upgrade Mattermost to versions 10.11.2, 10.10.3, or 10.5.11 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict OAuth provider configuration and monitor for unauthorized team joins.
Upgrade to 10.5.11, 10.10.3, or 10.11.3 depending on your current branch (10.5.x, 10.10.x, or 10.11.x)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Mattermost Server version by checking the system or Mattermost configuration
- 2. For Mattermost 10.5.x (versions 10.5.0 through 10.5.10): Upgrade to version 10.5.11
- 3. For Mattermost 10.10.x (versions 10.10.0 through 10.10.2): Upgrade to version 10.10.3
- 4. For Mattermost 10.11.x (versions 10.11.0 through 10.11.1): Upgrade to version 10.11.3
- 5. Before upgrading, review the Mattermost upgrade guide and take a complete backup of the database and configuration files
- 6. After upgrading, verify the OAuth configuration and team invite settings to ensure the authorization fix is working correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58073 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58073 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data