CVE-2025-58077
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in TP-Link Archer AX53 v1.0 (tmpserver modules) allows authenticated adjacent attackers to cause a segmentation fault or potentially execute arbitrary code via a specially crafted set of network packets containing an excessive number of host entries This issue affects Archer AX53 v1.0: through 1.3.1 Build 20241120.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in the tmpserver module of TP-Link Archer AX53 v1.0 allows authenticated adjacent attackers to send specially crafted network packets containing excessive host entries, overflowing the heap buffer and potentially enabling code execution or causing denial of service via segmentation fault.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model and firmware versionAccess the router's web management interface (typically at 192.168.0.1) or via SSH and navigate to the Firmware Upgrade or System settings section to view the exact firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is exactly 1.0 (1.0.x or 1.0 build numbers)
-
Verify tmpserver module accessibilityCheck if the tmpserver functionality is accessible on the device by examining the web interface or attempting to access common tmpserver endpoints (often port 8080 or /tmpserver paths)Affected if The tmpserver module is exposed and responds to requests from the local network
-
Check remote management settingsExamine the router's Administration or Management settings to determine if remote/adjacent network access to the tmpserver is enabled, particularly looking for settings like 'Enable Remote Management' or 'Allow Remote Access'Affected if Remote or adjacent network access to the management interface is enabled and accessible from non-LAN segments
-
Identify authentication exposureReview the router's access control and authentication settings to determine if default credentials are in use or if the administrative interface is accessible without strong authentication from the local networkAffected if The router allows unauthenticated or weakly authenticated access to the tmpserver functionality from adjacent network segments
The device is affected if it is a TP-Link Archer AX53 running firmware version 1.0 with the tmpserver module accessible from the adjacent network without proper access controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor firmware updates when available; otherwise, restrict adjacent network access and enforce strong authentication to limit attack surface.
Latest available Archer AX53 v1.0 firmware (verify on TP-Link support website)
- 1. Identify the current firmware version of the TP-Link Archer AX53 v1.0 by accessing the router's web management interface or checking the device label.
- 2. Navigate to the TP-Link support website (www.tp-link.com) and search for the Archer AX53 firmware downloads section.
- 3. Download the latest available firmware version for the Archer AX53 v1.0.
- 4. Access the router's web management interface, go to the Administration > Firmware Upgrade section.
- 5. Upload and apply the downloaded firmware file, ensuring the device remains powered on during the update process.
- 6. After the firmware update completes, verify the new firmware version matches the latest available release.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58077 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58077 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data